Loading…

Radiocollaring and Stress Hormones in African Wild Dogs

Handling wild animals involves some risk. The risks of general anesthesia are not taken lightly by doctors, and they should not be taken lightly by biologists studying endangered species. Recent debate about the effects of handling on African wild dogs (Lycaon pictus) has focused attention on the po...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Conservation biology 1997-04, Vol.11 (2), p.544-548
Main Authors: Creel, Scott, Creel, Nancy Marusha, Monfort, Steven L.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Handling wild animals involves some risk. The risks of general anesthesia are not taken lightly by doctors, and they should not be taken lightly by biologists studying endangered species. Recent debate about the effects of handling on African wild dogs (Lycaon pictus) has focused attention on the potential consequences of handling. All agree that the risks of handling should be assessed and weighed against the benefits of the research, but few studies present direct data on the effects of handling. We show that radiocollaring African wild dogs does not cause chronic stress, does not lead to increased aggression, and does not increase the risk of dying. Studies of radiocollared wild dogs have identified ecological factors that regulate wild dog numbers, and this information will be of use in conserving the species. We suggest that the benefits of studying wild dogs outweigh the potential risks.
ISSN:0888-8892
1523-1739
DOI:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1997.95476.x