Psychosis risk screening: A systematic review

• Published in: Schizophrenia research 2014-09, Vol.158 (1), p.11-18
• Main Authors: Kline, Emily, Schiffman, Jason
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Attenuated symptoms; Clinical high-risk; Humans; Prodrome; Psychiatry; Psychosis; Psychotic Disorders - diagnosis; Risk; Schizophrenia; Screening
• ISSN: 0920-9964; 1573-2509
• DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2014.06.036

Abstract Despite the wealth of evidence linking duration of untreated psychosis to critical illness outcomes, most clinicians do not utilize any formal evaluation tools to identify attenuated or emerging psychotic symptoms. Given the costs associated with training and administration, interview-based assessments such as the Structured Interview for Psychosis Risk Syndromes (SIPS) are not likely to be widely adopted for clinical use. The ability to identify high-risk individuals through low-cost, brief methods is essential to the success of scalable prevention efforts. The aim of this article is to present a comprehensive review of the use of self-report forms as psychosis risk “screeners.” A literature search revealed 34 investigations in which authors used a self-report questionnaire as a first-step screener in a clinical high-risk assessment protocol. Information about each screener, including reported psychometric data, is presented within the review. Psychosis risk screeners have been used in diverse samples with the goals of validating assessments, screening populations for clinical referral, recruiting samples of interest for research participation, and estimating symptom prevalence and severity. Screeners focusing on attenuated psychotic experiences appear to measure a reliable construct with variable prevalence in help-seeking and general population samples. Administration of screeners to help-seeking populations can identify enriched samples with substantially elevated likelihood of meeting CHR criteria and transitioning to psychosis over time. More research is needed, however, to establish reliable norms and screening thresholds, as score elevations indicating a likely high-risk respondent appear to be unreliable across populations and settings.