Fluorescent nanoparticle probes for imaging of cancer

• Published in: Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology 2011-09, Vol.3 (5), p.501-510
• Main Authors: Santra, Swadeshmukul, Malhotra, Astha
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Animals; Biocompatibility; Cancer; Cell Line, Tumor; Core-shell structure; Diagnostic software; Diagnostic systems; Dyes; Fluorescence; Fluorescent dyes; Fluorescent Dyes - chemistry; Fluorescent indicators; Humans; Magnetic resonance imaging; Mice; Nanoparticles; Neoplasms - diagnosis; Neoplasms - pathology; Optical Imaging; Optical properties; Positron emission; Probes; Proteins; Quantum dots; Quantum Dots - chemistry; Solid tumors; Surface chemistry; Tomography
• ISSN: 1939-5116; 1939-0041; 1939-0041
• DOI: 10.1002/wnan.134

Fluorescent nanoparticles (FNPs) have received immense popularity in cancer imaging in recent years because of their attractive optical properties. In comparison to traditional organic‐based fluorescent dyes and fluorescent proteins, FNPs offer much improved sensitivity and photostability. FNPs in certain size range have a strong tendency to enter and retain in solid tumor tissue with abnormal (leaky) vasculature—a phenomenon known as Enhanced Permeation and Retention (EPR) effect, advancing their use for in vivo tumor imaging. Furthermore, large surface area of FNPs and their usual core–shell structure offer a platform for designing and fabricating multimodal/multifunctional nanoparticles (MMNPs). For effective cancer imaging, often the optical imaging modality is integrated with other nonoptical‐based imaging modalities such as MRI, X‐ray, and PET, thus creating multimodal nanoparticle (NP)‐based imaging probes. Such multimodal NP probes can be further integrated with therapeutic drug as well as cancer targeting agent leading to multifunctional NPs. Biocompatibility of FNPs is an important criterion that must be seriously considered during FNP design. NP composition, size, and surface chemistry must be carefully selected to minimize potential toxicological consequences both in vitro and in vivo. In this article, we will mainly focus on three different types of FNPs: dye‐loaded NPs, quantum dots (Qdots), and phosphores; briefly highlighting their potential use in translational research. WIREs Nanomed Nanobiotechnol 2011 3 501–510 DOI: 10.1002/wnan.134 This article is categorized under: Diagnostic Tools > In Vivo Nanodiagnostics and Imaging