MR properties of water in saturated soils and resulting loss of MRI signal in water content detection at 2 tesla

• Published in: Geoderma 1997-11, Vol.80 (3), p.431-448
• Main Authors: Hall, Laurie D., Gao Amin, M.H., Dougherty, Elizabeth, Sanda, Martin, Votrubova, Jana, Richards, Keith S., Chorley, Richard J., Cislerova, Milena
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: MR properties; MR sitinal; saturated soil; soil properties; water content detection
• ISSN: 0016-7061; 1872-6259
• DOI: 10.1016/S0016-7061(97)00065-7

This paper reports a systematic MRI study at 2 tesla of 23 soils, each separately saturated with a known amount of water. The percentage of that water which could be detected using various MR methods was determined by comparison with a liquid reference sample. A pulse-acquire sequence gave a bulk detection of between 47 and 94% of the known water content of saturated soil. Also for bulk measurements, the inversion-recovery sequence used for determining T 1 values detected a range of 0.7–75% of the existing soil water. The CPMG sequence with an echo time (TE) of 1 ms used for determining the bulk T 2 values gave lower values, in the range of 0.4–66% overall. A spin-echo MRI sequence with a TE of 2.9 ms gave an even lower bulk detection, ranging from 0.2 to 57%. These low values for the detectable water content of bulk saturated soil water reflect the loss of water magnetization which occurs even during short echo time MR sequence at 2 tesla field strength. The source of the above findings was investigated by measurements of the longitudinal (T 1) and transverse (T 2) relaxation times and spectral linewidths of the soil-water protons, and by conventional analysis of soil properties. The MR parameters of critical importance to water quantification are T 2 and T 2 ∗, shorter values of which lead to a progressively greater loss of signal intensity for all MR protocols. Those parameters are affected by the following soil chemical and physical features: soil magnetic susceptibility, and the content of free iron oxides, clay, sand, exchangeable cations (K, Na and Ca), and organic matter. The implication of this work is that the only soil water which can be detected quantitatively at 2 tesla using a conventional spin-echo MRI protocol with echo times of 3 ms or longer is that located in the relatively large soil pores. Using the protocols investigated in this work, water in smaller pores will only be detected accurately for soils which have relatively low paramagnetic-metal impurities and/or have low clay content. Future MR studies of soil water should consider the use of other MRI protocols (e.g. for solid state), and measurement at low magnetic fields.