Loading…

Independent association of obstructive sleep apnea with left ventricular geometry and systolic function in resistant hypertension: the RESIST-POL study

Abstract Objective We investigated the impact of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and night blood pressure (BP) on left ventricular geometry and systolic function in patients with resistant hypertension (RHTN). Methods and Results Data from 155 patients with RHTN were analyzed. All patients underwent b...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Sleep medicine 2014-11, Vol.15 (11), p.1302-1308
Main Authors: Dobrowolski, Piotr, Klisiewicz, Anna, Florczak, Elżbieta, Prejbisz, Aleksander, Bieleń, Przemysław, Śliwiński, Paweł, Kabat, Marek, Rybicka, Justyna, Topór-Mądry, Roman, Januszewicz, Andrzej, Hoffman, Piotr
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Objective We investigated the impact of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and night blood pressure (BP) on left ventricular geometry and systolic function in patients with resistant hypertension (RHTN). Methods and Results Data from 155 patients with RHTN were analyzed. All patients underwent biochemical evaluations, ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM), and polysomnography. Left ventricular mass index (LVMI), relative wall thickness (RWT), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), midwall fractional shortening (mwFS) and global longitudinal strain (GLS) were measured. Patients were divided into four groups based on the presence of metabolic syndrome (MS) and OSA: group 1: OSA(−), MS(−) [ n  = 42]; group 2: OSA(+), MS(−) [ n  = 14]; group 3: OSA(–), MS(+) [ n  = 46]; and group 4: OSA(+), MS(+) [ n  = 53]. In group 3 and 4 concentric geometry was present in 53.2% and 79.6% respectively ( P  = 0.004). There were no differences in LVEF between groups. Group 3 and 4 had lower mwFS as compared with group 1 (16.40 ± 1.9 and 15.38 ± 2.2 vs 17.44 ± 1.9; P  
ISSN:1389-9457
1878-5506
DOI:10.1016/j.sleep.2014.06.015