Mitochondrial DNA Variability of the Gray Wolf: Genetic Consequences of Population Decline and Habitat Fragmentation

• Published in: Conservation biology 1992-12, Vol.6 (4), p.559-569
• Main Authors: Wayne, Robert K., Lehman, Niles, Allard, Marc W., Honeycutt, Rodney L.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Animal and plant ecology; Animal, plant and microbial ecology; Animals; Biological and medical sciences; Canis lupus; Conservation biology; Demecology; Depopulation; Dogs; Ecological genetics; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Genetic variation; Genetics of eukaryotes. Biological and molecular evolution; Genotypes; Habitat fragmentation; Mammalia; Mitochondrial DNA; Population genetics; Population genetics, reproduction patterns; Vertebrata; Wolves
• ISSN: 0888-8892; 1523-1739
• DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1992.06040559.x

The gray wolf is a large, highly mobile predator whose original geographic range included most of the Northern Hemisphere. High rates of genetic exchange probably characterized even distantly-separated populations in the past, but recent population declines and habitat fragmentation have isolated previously contiguous populations, especially in the Old World. We examine mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) variability among twenty-six populations of wolves from throughout their geographic range. We find eighteen mtDNA genotypes in gray wolves: seven of these are derived from hybridization with coyotes, four are confined to the New World, six are confined to the Old World, and one is shared by both areas. Genetic differentiation among wolf populations is significant but small in magnitude. In the Old World, most localities have a single unique genotype, whereas in the New World several genotypes occur at most localities and three of the five genotypes are nearly ubiquitous. The pattern of genetic differentiation in the gray wolf contrasts with that of another large, highly vagile canid, the coyote, in which genetic differentiation among populations is not significant even among widely separated localities. We suggest that the difference between these two species reflects the rapid, recent increase in coyote numbers and expansion of their geographic range, and the coincident decline in gray wolf populations. Apparent genetic differences among extant wolf populations may be a recent phenomenon reflecting population declines and habitat fragmentation rather than a long history of genetic isolation.