Bidirectional Relationships Between Client and Counselor Speech: The Importance of Reframing

• Published in: Psychology of addictive behaviors 2014-12, Vol.28 (4), p.1212-1219
• Main Authors: Barnett, Elizabeth, Spruijt-Metz, Donna, Moyers, Theresa B., Smith, Caitlin, Rohrbach, Louise A., Sun, Ping, Sussman, Steve
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adolescent; Adult; Clients; Counseling; Counselors; Female; Human; Humans; Interpersonal Communication; Language; Listening (Interpersonal); Male; Motivational Interviewing; Motivational Interviewing - methods; Professional-Patient Relations; Psychotherapeutic Processes; Speech
• ISSN: 0893-164X; 1939-1501
• DOI: 10.1037/a0036227

In the study of motivational interviewing (MI), counselor skill has been posited to influence client language about change or "change talk." This study investigates the relationship between a specific counselor behavior, valenced reflective listening, and client change talk in a MI intervention with substance-using adolescents. A combination of recorded in-person and telephone (n = 223) sessions were sequentially coded using the Motivational Interviewing Skill Code 2.5. Reflections were categorized by valence, meaning they included content that was either moving toward (i.e., positive reflection) or away from change (i.e., negative reflection). Client language was coded as either moving toward change, away from change, or neutral about change. Probability analyses showed positive reflections were 11 times more likely to be followed by change talk and 71% less likely to be followed by counter change talk. Negative reflections were 19 times more likely to be followed by counter change talk and 65% less likely to be followed by change talk. Client language was also predictive of counselor reflections, such that positive reflections were 10 times more likely to occur after client change talk and negative reflections were 19 times more likely to follow counter change talk. Because the percentage of change talk expressed in a session has been shown to be positively related to improved behavioral outcomes, counselors should avoid unintentional reflections of counter change talk and use reframing techniques to change the valence of client change language. Implications for MI practice and training are discussed.