Loading…
Clindamycin–primaquine for pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia in renal transplant patients
Background Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX) is considered first-line therapy for pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia (PCP) in renal transplant patients. Alternatives have not been formally studied. Clindamycin–primaquine (C–P) is effective in HIV-associated PCP, but data in renal transplant patie...
Saved in:
Published in: | Infection 2014-12, Vol.42 (6), p.981-989 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Background
Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX) is considered first-line therapy for pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia (PCP) in renal transplant patients. Alternatives have not been formally studied. Clindamycin–primaquine (C–P) is effective in HIV-associated PCP, but data in renal transplant patients are lacking.
Patients and methods
Retrospective cohort study of 57 consecutive renal transplant patients who developed PCP and were treated with C–P (
n
= 23) or TMP/SMX (
n
= 34).
Results
A non-significantly higher failure rate was observed in patients on C–P due to lack of efficacy (30.4 versus 20.6 %,
p
= 0.545). The difference was more pronounced in severe PCP (60 versus 37.5 %,
p
= 0.611) and a significantly lower efficacy of C–P was seen when used as salvage therapy. The two patients who had received C–P after not responding to TMP/SMX failed this regimen, but all seven patients who had failed initial treatment with C–P and had been switched to TMP/SMX were cured (
p
= 0.028). No treatment-limiting adverse reactions were reported for patients on C–P while six patients (17.6 %) on TMP/SMX developed possibly related treatment-limiting toxicity (
p
= 0.071). However, in only two patients adverse events were definitely related to TMP/SMX (5.9 %).
Conclusions
Clindamycin–primaquine appears to be safe and well tolerated for treating PCP in renal transplant patients but is probably less effective than TMP/SMX, the standard regimen. However, our data indicates that C–P represents an acceptable alternative for patients with contraindications or treatment emergent toxicities during TMP/SMX use. Notably, TMP/SMX was also acceptably tolerated in most patients. TMP/SMX remains an effective salvage regimen in case of C–P failure. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0300-8126 1439-0973 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s15010-014-0660-y |