Loading…
Beyond deadlock
Today's atmospheric global circulation models can represent the effects of clouds through “conventional” parameterizations on coarse grids, through the use of global high‐resolution grids, or through the use of embedded cloud‐resolving models as superparameterizations in a lower resolution glob...
Saved in:
Published in: | Geophysical research letters 2013-11, Vol.40 (22), p.5970-5976 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Today's atmospheric global circulation models can represent the effects of clouds through “conventional” parameterizations on coarse grids, through the use of global high‐resolution grids, or through the use of embedded cloud‐resolving models as superparameterizations in a lower resolution global model. Recent work on conventional parameterizations has been aimed at improving the representation of entrainment, including nondeterministic effects, and achieving resolution independence. Global high‐resolution grids have been very useful for studying the interaction of clouds with the global circulation out to time scales of about one simulated year; longer simulations are not yet feasible. Superparameterizations have already been used in simulations longer than a century and have succeeded in simulating the Madden‐Julian Oscillation, the diurnal cycle of precipitation, and other phenomena that have presented challenges for conventionally parameterized models.
Key Points
Parameterizations are improving rapidly
Process models and global models are now overlapping sets
Midtropospheric water vapor is key to the MJO |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0094-8276 1944-8007 |
DOI: | 10.1002/2013GL057998 |