Trauma, technology and the ontology of the modern subject

For later Heidegger, in the human sciences, technology involves enframing or ordering of human being into standing reserve, or resource, for the ends of a calculative rationality. With some similarity, Foucault takes up technology as a ‘grid of intelligibility’ for power/knowledge, and in those prac...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Critical psychology (Lawrence & Wishart) 2013-09, Vol.6 (3), p.298-319
Main Author: Roberts, John L
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Consciousness
Enlightenment
Foucault, Michel
Heidegger, Martin
Knowledge
Memory
Modernity
Ontology
Original Article
Power
Rationality
Social Sciences
Subject
Subjectivity
Technology
Trauma
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:For later Heidegger, in the human sciences, technology involves enframing or ordering of human being into standing reserve, or resource, for the ends of a calculative rationality. With some similarity, Foucault takes up technology as a ‘grid of intelligibility’ for power/knowledge, and in those practices deploying the subject’s own ethical self-understanding. This article integrates dimensions of modern subjectivity articulated by Heidegger and Foucault, hermeneutically inquiring into the emergent intelligibility of modern subjectivity as depicted in psychological accounts of trauma in Janet, Freud, Caruth and others. It is argued that trauma, as a dispositif , technologically refashions the masterful subject that fell into crisis after the early Enlightenment. It is also suggested that technological enframing of trauma as the collapse of memory and language underwrites the subject’s own space of reflexivity, while concealing the subject’s fractured ontological and temporal horizon.
ISSN:1755-6341
1755-635X
DOI:10.1057/sub.2013.6