Optimization of landslide conditioning factors using very high-resolution airborne laser scanning (LiDAR) data at catchment scale

• Published in: Remote sensing of environment 2014-09, Vol.152, p.150-165
• Main Authors: Jebur, Mustafa Neamah, Pradhan, Biswajeet, Tehrany, Mahyat Shafapour
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Animal, plant and microbial ecology; Applied geophysics; Biological and medical sciences; Catchments; Conditioning; Conditioning factors; Construction; Earth sciences; Earth, ocean, space; Exact sciences and technology; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; General aspects. Techniques; Geology; GIS; Internal geophysics; Landslide; Landslides; LiDAR; Malaysia; Mapping; Mathematical models; Remote sensing; Support vector machines; Susceptibility mapping; Teledetection and vegetation maps
• ISSN: 0034-4257; 1879-0704
• DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2014.05.013

Landslide susceptibility, hazards, and risks have been extensively explored and analyzed in the past decades. However, choosing relevant conditioning factors in such analyses remains a challenging task. Landslide susceptibility mapping employs topological, environmental, geological, and hydrological parameters. Some researchers assume that as the number of conditioning factors increases, the precision of the generated susceptibility map increases. By contrast, other case studies prove that a small number of conditioning factors are sufficient to produce landslide susceptibility maps with a reasonable quality. This study investigates the effects of conditioning factors on landslide susceptibility mapping. Bukit Antarabangsa, Ulu Klang, Malaysia was selected as the study area, because it is a catchment area with a high potential of landslide occurrence. A spatial database of 31 landslide locations was evaluated to map landslide-susceptible areas. Two datasets of conditioning factors were constructed in GIS environment. The first dataset was derived from high-resolution airborne laser scanning data (LiDAR), which contains eight landslide conditioning factors: altitude, slope, aspect, curvature, stream power index (SPI), topographic wetness index (TWI), topographic roughness index (TRI), and sediment transport index (STI). The second dataset was gathered by using the same conditioning factors of the first dataset, but with the addition of other conditioning factors: geological and environmental factors of soil, geology, land use/cover (LULC), distance from river, and distance from road. Two different datasets were constructed to compare the efficiency of one over the other in landslide susceptibility zonation. Three methods were implemented to recognize the importance of different conditioning factors in landslide susceptibility mapping. Three different types of models such as weights-of-evidence (WoE) (bivariate statistical analysis), logistic regression (LR) (multivariate statistical analysis), and data-driven support vector machine (SVM) were used to determine the optimal landslide conditioning factors. The area under curve (AUC) was used to assess the obtained results. The prediction rates of WoE, LR, and SVM obtained from only the LiDAR-derived conditioning factors were 59%, 86%, and 84%, respectively. The prediction rates of the WoE, LR, and SVM obtained from the second dataset were 65%, 66%, and 69%, respectively. The LiDAR-derived conditioning factors