Loading…

Effect of different livestock dungs as inoculum on food waste anaerobic digestion and its kinetics

•Different livestock dung as inoculum for methane production from food waste digestion.•Cow dung followed by piggery dung added reactors produced higher methane production.•Kinetic studies showed the higher R2 and M value for cow dung added reactor.•Highest volatile solids degradation was observed i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Bioresource technology 2015-03, Vol.180, p.237-241
Main Authors: Dhamodharan, Kondusamy, Kumar, Vikas, Kalamdhad, Ajay S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•Different livestock dung as inoculum for methane production from food waste digestion.•Cow dung followed by piggery dung added reactors produced higher methane production.•Kinetic studies showed the higher R2 and M value for cow dung added reactor.•Highest volatile solids degradation was observed in cow dung added reactor. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different livestock inoculums on the anaerobic digestion of food waste (FW). Five different livestock dungs i.e., poultry dung (PD), goat dung (GD), cow dung (CD), piggery dung (PGD) and rhinoceros dung (RD) were utilized as inoculums and their effects were valued in various food to microorganism (F/M) ratios in batch reactors. Different livestock dungs achieved higher methane production and volatile solids (VS) reduction in different F/M ratios such as PD, GD, CD, PGD and RD achieved at F/M ratio maintained at 1.5, 2, 2, 1.5 and 1.5, respectively. The results indicated that CD and PGD inoculum were more suitable for the anaerobic digestion of FW than other livestock dungs. Reactors inoculated with CD achieved higher methane production (227mLg−1VS degraded) and volatile solids degradation (54.58%) at F/M ratio maintained at 2.
ISSN:0960-8524
1873-2976
DOI:10.1016/j.biortech.2014.12.066