Minimum effective area for high resolution crater counting of martian terrains

• Published in: Icarus (New York, N.Y. 1962) N.Y. 1962), 2015-01, Vol.245, p.198-240
• Main Authors: Warner, Nicholas H., Gupta, Sanjeev, Calef, Fred, Grindrod, Peter, Boll, Nathan, Goddard, Kate
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Counting; Cratering; Craters; Impact processes; Mars; Mars, surface; Resurfacing; Samples; Statistical analysis; Statistical methods; Surfacing; Terrain
• ISSN: 0019-1035; 1090-2643
• DOI: 10.1016/j.icarus.2014.09.024

•Resurfacing on Mars influences small area crater counts globally.•Spatial variability in the cratering pattern influences small area crater counts.•Spatial variability and resurfacing create large age uncertainties at 100km2.•Uncertainties from crater counting markedly improve from 1000km2 to 10,000km2. The acquisition of high-resolution imagery for the surface of Mars has enabled mapping of spatially limited (order of 200m) on four type terrains using Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO) Context Camera (CTX) imagery that span the Noachian, Hesperian, and Amazonian epochs. The counts from each location include a region covering 10,000km2, ten 1000km2 subsets of that larger area, and approximately one hundred 100km2 samples. The data demonstrate significant variation in the crater size frequency and derived model ages across a single terrain type for the 100km2 samples. The crater size frequency at this area scale varies across a single, uniform geologic unit by up to a factor of 2–3 on the four different terrains. At 1000km2, the local pattern variations that are relevant at the 100km2 scale become less important and the age variations are tighter. In all four terrain cases, the 10,000km2 and 1000km2 samples capture distinct crater populations (km-sized craters) that formed before and after resurfacing event(s). However, due to the relatively high mean distance between km-sized craters, the 100km2 size area samples more commonly than not exclude a statistically significant sample at the kilometer size range, masking important information about the pre-resurfacing history of the terrain. We therefore suggest that due to the effect of pattern variability in cratering over 100km2 and the susceptibility of smaller craters to resurfacing, crater counts derived from small area samples are suspect to major uncertainties.