Characterizing riverbed sediment using high-frequency acoustics: 2. Scattering signatures of Colorado River bed sediment in Marble and Grand Canyons

• Published in: Journal of geophysical research. Earth surface 2014-12, Vol.119 (12), p.2692-2710
• Main Authors: Buscombe, D., Grams, P. E., Kaplinski, M. A.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Acoustics; Backscattering; Bed load; Calibration; Canyons; Classification (sedimentation); grain size; Gravel; multibeam sonar; River beds; Rivers; sediment classification; Sediments; Signatures; Spectra; stochastic modeling; Underwater
• ISSN: 2169-9003; 2169-9011
• DOI: 10.1002/2014JF003191

In this, the second of a pair of papers on the statistical signatures of riverbed sediment in high‐frequency acoustic backscatter, spatially explicit maps of the stochastic geometries (length and amplitude scales) of backscatter are related to patches of riverbed surfaces composed of known sediment types, as determined by georeferenced underwater video observations. Statistics of backscatter magnitudes alone are found to be poor discriminators between sediment types. However, the variance of the power spectrum and the intercept and slope from a power law spectral form (termed the spectral strength and exponent, respectively) successfully discriminate between sediment types. A decision tree approach was able to classify spatially heterogeneous patches of homogeneous sands, gravels (and sand‐gravel mixtures), and cobbles/boulders with 95, 88, and 91% accuracy, respectively. Application to sites outside the calibration and surveys made at calibration sites at different times were plausible based on observations from underwater video. Analysis of decision trees built with different training data sets suggested that the spectral exponent was consistently the most important variable in the classification. In the absence of theory concerning how spatially variable sediment surfaces scatter high‐frequency sound, the primary advantage of this data‐driven approach to classify bed sediment over alternatives is that spectral methods have well‐understood properties and make no assumptions about the distributional form of the fluctuating component of backscatter over small spatial scales. Key Points Examines relationship between backscatter spectral properties and sediment types Slope, intercept, and integral of power law spectral form sensitive to sediments Uses this to successfully classify Colorado River bed sediment in Grand Canyon