The Role of Aquatic Science in Freshwater Conservation: Cooperation between the North American Benthological Society and Organizations for Conservation and Resource Management

• Published in: Journal of the North American Benthological Society 1993-06, Vol.12 (2), p.177-184
• Main Authors: Pringle, Catherine M., Rabeni, Charles F., Benke, Arthur C., Aumen, Nicholas G.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Biodiversity conservation; Conservation biology; Conservation movement; Ecological sustainability; Environmental conservation; Freshwater ecology; Marine ecology; Perspectives on Freshwater Conservation; Water conservation; Wetland conservation; Wetland ecology
• ISSN: 0887-3593; 1937-237X
• DOI: 10.2307/1467348

The accelerated impact of humankind on freshwater ecosystems over the last few decades is unprecedented and the need for effective cooperation between scientists and organizations for conservation and resource management has never been greater. The river conservation community has expanded its focus from recreational stream segments to promotion of ecosystem-based conservation policies at national and state levels. Scientists are moving beyond documentation of the deterioration of freshwater ecosystems towards application of their knowledge to management and restoration solutions. However, in spite of research, symposia and workshops, and new applied professional journals, much remains to be done. Here we review some of the challenges and opportunities for effective application of ecological information to solutions to environmental problems in aquatic systems. We focus on avenues for enhanced communication and cooperation between the scientific community and organizations for conservation and resource management. Specific recommendations include: (1) maintenance of regular communication between respective organizations through formal liaisons; (2) development of 'State of the Science' papers focusing on key and timely conservation issues (e.g., hydropower, wetlands loss); (3) participation of scientists in selection of alternative management solutions to specific environmental problems, definition of biological criteria in evaluating solutions, and predictions of how the biological system will respond to alternative solutions; (4) review of the scientific content of documents developed by conservation and resource management groups; (5) development of a database that will serve as a clearinghouse of aquatic scientists who have expertise in specific areas; and (6) development of research priorities for specific sites or projects that will directly aid non-governmental organizations in the pursuit of conservation objectives and direct communication of these priorities to the scientific community.