Loading…

In-office biopsy of upper airway lesions: Safety, tolerance, and effect on time to treatment

Objectives/Hypothesis Definitive tissue diagnosis for lesions warranting biopsy is shifting from the operating room to the office. Safety, tolerance, factors related to successful biopsy, and time to treatment are not well‐defined. Methods Retrospective review of 116 patients undergoing in‐office bi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Laryngoscope 2015-04, Vol.125 (4), p.919-923
Main Authors: Lippert, Dylan, Hoffman, Matthew R., Dang, Phat, McCulloch, Timothy M., Hartig, Gregory K., Dailey, Seth H.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objectives/Hypothesis Definitive tissue diagnosis for lesions warranting biopsy is shifting from the operating room to the office. Safety, tolerance, factors related to successful biopsy, and time to treatment are not well‐defined. Methods Retrospective review of 116 patients undergoing in‐office biopsy of oropharynx, larynx, or hypopharynx were included. Logistic regression determined if demographics, site, T‐stage, or approach (transoral/transnasal) were related to success. Time to definitive treatment was also analyzed. Results Ninety‐two transnasal and 24 transoral biopsies were performed on 73 laryngeal, 35 oropharyngeal, and 8 hypopharyngeal lesions. Of those, 97 of 116 diagnoses were made in‐office. There were no complications; two patients did not tolerate the procedure. Success was not related to age (P = 0.374), site (P = 0.527), T‐stage (P = 0.587), or approach (P = 0.566). Time to treatment was 24.2 ± 13.9 days with successful office biopsy and 48.8 ± 49.4 days without. Conclusions High procedural completion rate was observed across patients, sites, and approaches. All patients should be considered for in‐office biopsy, a more time‐ and cost‐effective option leading to earlier treatment. Level of Evidence 4. Laryngoscope, 125:919–923, 2015
ISSN:0023-852X
1531-4995
DOI:10.1002/lary.25007