Political Violence, Interstate Rivalry, and the Diffusion of Public Health Crises

Objective. The objectives of the study were to expand the literature on political violence and public health by exploring the possibility that the public health consequences of civil war not only apply to the host country, but also diffuse across international borders. We discuss and empirically tes...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Social science quarterly 2014-12, Vol.95 (4), p.1101-1120
Main Authors: Reeder, Bryce W., Reeder, Matthew R.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Armed conflict
Biological and medical sciences
Borders
Civil War
Civil wars
Conflict
Dyads
General Interest
Health outcomes
Illness
Incentives
Infant Mortality
Interstate conflict
Intrastate conflict
Medical sciences
Mortality
Mortality Rates
Political sociology
Political Violence
Public Health
Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine
Refugees
Rivalry
Sociology
Violence
Wars
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objective. The objectives of the study were to expand the literature on political violence and public health by exploring the possibility that the public health consequences of civil war not only apply to the host country, but also diffuse across international borders. We discuss and empirically test a diffusion mechanism absent from the literature in this area—the incentive of a proximate state to reallocate resources in response to intrastate violence and the presence of interstate rivalry. Methods. Our hypotheses were tested using a directed dyad research design that included all politically relevant dyads from 1997 to 2001. We used fixed-effects panel regression to estimate the influence of proximate intrastate violence and interstate rivalry on changes in infant mortality rate (IMR). Results. Our results indicated that proximate intrastate violence and interstate rivalry are associated with increases in IMR. In addition, the influence of proximate intrastate violence on IMR increases as the severity of the conflict increases. Conclusion. The public health consequences of civil war do diffuse across international borders, especially in cases in which interstate rivalry was present and the political violence in a proximate state was severe.
ISSN:0038-4941
1540-6237
DOI:10.1111/ssqu.12108