Loading…

On the volume change in Co–Ni–Al during pseudoelasticity

▶ The volumetric strain is measured as 2% for CoNiAl. ▶ Novel experimental techniques were used to measure the strains. ▶ Lattice constant measurements also result in tensile volumetric strains. ▶ This magnitude of strain is unusually high for shape memory alloys. ▶ Pseudoelasticity depends on the M...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Materials science & engineering. A, Structural materials : properties, microstructure and processing Structural materials : properties, microstructure and processing, 2011-03, Vol.528 (6), p.2875-2881
Main Authors: Dilibal, S., Sehitoglu, H., Hamilton, R.F., Maier, H.J., Chumlyakov, Y.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:▶ The volumetric strain is measured as 2% for CoNiAl. ▶ Novel experimental techniques were used to measure the strains. ▶ Lattice constant measurements also result in tensile volumetric strains. ▶ This magnitude of strain is unusually high for shape memory alloys. ▶ Pseudoelasticity depends on the Md−Af differential. CoNiAl alloys are a new class of shape memory alloys, which exhibit pseudoelastic strains as high 6% over a broad range of temperatures. Based on the crystallographic lattice constants, a substantial volume change upon transformation is expected at the mesoscopic level, yet it has not been measured previously. Transformation strains are established in three mutually orthogonal directions in the [001]-oriented CoNiAl single crystals under compression. Experiments reveal that the transformation volume change is approximately 2% based on determination of strains on transformed and untransformed locations. Despite the high volumetric strain, the pseudoelastic stress–strain response represents full recoverability with small stress hysteresis. Additional factors that influence pseudoelasticity behavior are discussed particularly the Md−Af interval and the flow resistance, which are both higher for CoNiAl compared to other shape memory alloys.
ISSN:0921-5093
1873-4936
DOI:10.1016/j.msea.2010.12.056