Loading…
The growth of Al-doped ZnO nanorods on c-axis sapphire by pulsed laser deposition
Transmission and scanning electron microscopy are used to compare the growth of nanorod arrays in ZnO and Al-doped ZnO (2%Al) films grown by pulsed laser deposition. For a laser pulse energy of 10 mJ/pulse, nanorod arrays were formed at temperatures 575–625 °C for ZnO films and 650–675 °C for Al-dop...
Saved in:
Published in: | Surface & coatings technology 2011-08, Vol.205 (21), p.5083-5087 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Transmission and scanning electron microscopy are used to compare the growth of nanorod arrays in ZnO and Al-doped ZnO (2%Al) films grown by pulsed laser deposition. For a laser pulse energy of 10
mJ/pulse, nanorod arrays were formed at temperatures 575–625
°C for ZnO films and 650–675
°C for Al-doped ZnO films. For higher laser pulse energies, up to 30
mJ/pulse, nanorod growth in both cases moved to lower temperature regimes. By comparing nanorod growth temperature, morphology and density for ZnO and Al-doped ZnO growth, it is concluded that the differences in growth are due to lower surface diffusion rates in Al-doped films. The electrical resistivities of the Al doped ZnO films were in the range 5–7
×
10
−
3
Ω∙cm.
► Pure ZnO and Al-doped ZnO (AZO) nanorods can be grown by pulsed laser deposition. ► AZO nanorods grow at a higher temperature compared to ZnO at a given laser energy. ► For higher laser energy, growth in both cases moved into lower temperature regimes. ► The differences can be explained by lower surface diffusion rates in AZO. ► The electrical resistivities of AZO films were in the range 5–7
×
10
−
3
Ω∙cm. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0257-8972 1879-3347 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2011.05.011 |