Loading…

The growth of Al-doped ZnO nanorods on c-axis sapphire by pulsed laser deposition

Transmission and scanning electron microscopy are used to compare the growth of nanorod arrays in ZnO and Al-doped ZnO (2%Al) films grown by pulsed laser deposition. For a laser pulse energy of 10 mJ/pulse, nanorod arrays were formed at temperatures 575–625 °C for ZnO films and 650–675 °C for Al-dop...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Surface & coatings technology 2011-08, Vol.205 (21), p.5083-5087
Main Authors: Kumarakuru, Haridas, Cherns, David, Fuge, Gareth M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Transmission and scanning electron microscopy are used to compare the growth of nanorod arrays in ZnO and Al-doped ZnO (2%Al) films grown by pulsed laser deposition. For a laser pulse energy of 10 mJ/pulse, nanorod arrays were formed at temperatures 575–625 °C for ZnO films and 650–675 °C for Al-doped ZnO films. For higher laser pulse energies, up to 30 mJ/pulse, nanorod growth in both cases moved to lower temperature regimes. By comparing nanorod growth temperature, morphology and density for ZnO and Al-doped ZnO growth, it is concluded that the differences in growth are due to lower surface diffusion rates in Al-doped films. The electrical resistivities of the Al doped ZnO films were in the range 5–7 × 10 − 3 Ω∙cm. ► Pure ZnO and Al-doped ZnO (AZO) nanorods can be grown by pulsed laser deposition. ► AZO nanorods grow at a higher temperature compared to ZnO at a given laser energy. ► For higher laser energy, growth in both cases moved into lower temperature regimes. ► The differences can be explained by lower surface diffusion rates in AZO. ► The electrical resistivities of AZO films were in the range 5–7 × 10 − 3 Ω∙cm.
ISSN:0257-8972
1879-3347
DOI:10.1016/j.surfcoat.2011.05.011