Subjective and Objective Measures of Relaxed +G(z) Tolerance Following Repeated +G(z) Exposure

Background: Repeated exposure to +G(z) acceleration provokes cardiovascular adaptations of potential benefit to pilots' +G(z) tolerance, but whether such changes actually improve human tolerance to +G(z), acceleration is uncertain. This study assessed +G(z) tolerance before and after repeated e...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Aviation, space, and environmental medicine space, and environmental medicine, 2013-07, Vol.84 (7), p.684-691
Main Authors: Scott, Jonathan P R, Jungius, James, Connolly, Desmond, Stevenson, Alec T
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Acceleration
Adaptation
Blood pressure
Camber
Heart rate
Human tolerances
Tilt
Tolerances
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background: Repeated exposure to +G(z) acceleration provokes cardiovascular adaptations of potential benefit to pilots' +G(z) tolerance, but whether such changes actually improve human tolerance to +G(z), acceleration is uncertain. This study assessed +G(z) tolerance before and after repeated exposure to +G(z) at two different intensities as the role of frequency of +G(z) exposure in adaptation also remains unknown. Methods: In a cross-over design, 10 experienced male centrifuge volunteers completed two experimental conditions separated by at least 3 wk. Subjects completed four simulated air combat maneuvers (SACM) on a human centrifuge, either twice or four times per week, for 3 consecutive weeks. Relaxed +G(z) tolerance (RGT) during a gradual onset run (GOR, 0.1 G upsilon . s(-1)) and cardiovascular responses to rapid and incremental head-up tilt were assessed before and after each condition. Results: Rapid and incremental head-up tilt increased both mean arterial and diastolic blood pressures following +G(z) exposure. +G(z) exposure attenuated the increase in heart rate (+9 plus or minus 3 vs. +11 plus or minus 3 mmHg/G(Z)) and the decrease in eye-level systolic blood pressure (-11 plus or minus 3 vs. -14 plus or minus 4 mmHg/G(z)) during GOR, but had no effect on RGT (4/wk: +3.88 plus or minus 0.56 vs. +3.92 plus or minus 0.63 G(z); 2/wk: +3.89 plus or minus 0.69 vs. +3.92 plus or minus 0.69 G(z)). Discussion: Frequent +G(z) acceleration, either as 2 (8 SACMs) or 4 sessions (16 SACMs) per week for 3 wk, enhances cardiovascular tolerance to orthostatic stress but does not improve RGT measured during a GOR.
ISSN:0095-6562
DOI:10.3357/ASEM.3550.2013