Loading…

Fast CU size decision and mode decision algorithm for HEVC intra coding

The emerging international standard of High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC) is a successor to H.264/AVC. In the joint model of HEVC, the tree structured coding unit (CU) is adopted, which allows recursive splitting into four equally sized blocks. At each depth level, it enables up to 34 intra predict...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:IEEE transactions on consumer electronics 2013-02, Vol.59 (1), p.207-213
Main Authors: Shen, Liquan, Zhang, Zhaoyang, An, Ping
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The emerging international standard of High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC) is a successor to H.264/AVC. In the joint model of HEVC, the tree structured coding unit (CU) is adopted, which allows recursive splitting into four equally sized blocks. At each depth level, it enables up to 34 intra prediction modes. The intra mode decision process in HEVC is performed using all the possible depth levels and prediction modes to find the one with the least rate distortion (RD) cost using Lagrange multiplier. This achieves the highest coding efficiency but requires a very high computational complexity. In this paper, we propose a fast CU size decision and mode decision algorithm for HEVC intra coding. Since the optimal CU depth level is highly content-dependent, it is not efficient to use a fixed CU depth range for a whole image. Therefore, we can skip some specific depth levels rarely used in spatially nearby CUs. Meanwhile, there are RD cost and prediction mode correlations among different depth levels or spatially nearby CUs. By fully exploiting these correlations, we can skip some prediction modes which are rarely used in the parent CUs in the upper depth levels or spatially nearby CUs. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed algorithm can save 21% computational complexity on average with negligible loss of coding efficiency.
ISSN:0098-3063
1558-4127
DOI:10.1109/TCE.2013.6490261