Loading…
Metallurgy and mechanical performance of AZ31 magnesium alloy friction spot welds
► Metallurgical and geometric stress concentrators are identified in cross-section. ► Hook morphology and thermal input exhibit a strong influence over joint strength. ► Plastic flow originates around the recrystallized zone where tensile stresses are higher. ► Crack may propagate through or totally...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of materials processing technology 2013-04, Vol.213 (4), p.515-521 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | ► Metallurgical and geometric stress concentrators are identified in cross-section. ► Hook morphology and thermal input exhibit a strong influence over joint strength. ► Plastic flow originates around the recrystallized zone where tensile stresses are higher. ► Crack may propagate through or totally around the welded zone under shear loading. ► Fracture surfaces indicate extensive plastic deformation under shear.
Microstructural features were studied along the cross-section of AZ31 magnesium alloy friction spot welded joints made using different combinations of welding parameters. Static lap shear testing was performed to evaluate the mechanical properties of the welded joints, and the resulting fracture mechanisms and crack propagation paths were fully examined. Failure load is optimized when the welding procedure is performed with the combination of parameters that maximizes the material mixing, the size of fully metallurgical bonding and simultaneously minimizes the vertical displacement of hook region. The welds demonstrate three failure modes during lap shear testing: through the weld and non-circumferential pull-out modes, in which crack propagation crosses the recrystallized zone, and circumferential pull-out mode, around this zone. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0924-0136 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2012.11.002 |