Loading…
Can a creeping segment become a monitor before destructive major earthquakes?
There are few places in the world to monitor aseismic creep. One of them is the Ismetpasa segment of the North Anatolian Fault. The observations in the Ismetpasa showed that the creep rate progressively decreased along the 40 years before the 1999 Kocaeli-Golcuk (Mw = 7.6) earthquake and then starte...
Saved in:
Published in: | Natural hazards (Dordrecht) 2013-02, Vol.65 (3), p.2161-2173 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a468t-f93fb1f49107e3294b92afa5b1e22e33be20094c9b40baf4de5830fc80672c63 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a468t-f93fb1f49107e3294b92afa5b1e22e33be20094c9b40baf4de5830fc80672c63 |
container_end_page | 2173 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 2161 |
container_title | Natural hazards (Dordrecht) |
container_volume | 65 |
creator | Kutoglu, H. S. Gormus, K. S. Deguchi, T. Koksal, E. Kemaldere, H. Gundogdu, O. |
description | There are few places in the world to monitor aseismic creep. One of them is the Ismetpasa segment of the North Anatolian Fault. The observations in the Ismetpasa showed that the creep rate progressively decreased along the 40 years before the 1999 Kocaeli-Golcuk (Mw = 7.6) earthquake and then started increasing. This phenomenon might be a systematic of the creeping segments. If it is the case, this behavior can be utilized for early warning before the expected major earthquake in the Marmara Sea. In this study, the creep rate of the segment has been studied by GPS and InSAR technologies. The results showed that the rate has decreased to 1.3 cm a year. This result might be an indication of stress starting increase. If the segment retains the decreasing trend and it is ceased by a major earthquake, it would be a proof of the relationship between the creep process and the earthquakes. Then, the creep process might be utilized for early warning. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11069-012-0466-0 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1671595479</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3028641301</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a468t-f93fb1f49107e3294b92afa5b1e22e33be20094c9b40baf4de5830fc80672c63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUFr3DAQhUVJoZttfkBvhhDIxemMJEvWqYQlbQMJueSQm5CV0dabtb2R7EL_fWR2KSUQmtOA3qc3b3iMfUG4QAD9NSGCMiUgL0EqVcIHtsBKixJqCUdsAYZjCQIePrHjlDYAiIqbBbtdub5whY9Eu7ZfF4nWHfVj0ZAfOspKN_TtOMT8EIZIxSOlMU5-bH9T0blNFsjF8dfz5J4offvMPga3TXRymEt2__3qfvWzvLn7cb26vCmdVPVYBiNCg0EaBE2CG9kY7oKrGiTOSYiGOICR3jQSGhfkI1W1gOBrUJp7JZbsfG-7i8PzlBPZrk2etlvX0zAli0pjZSqpzf9RyY2qhEB4B4pGaFFXs-vpK3QzTLHPJ88Uz4t1PcfEPeXjkFKkYHex7Vz8YxHs3Jrdt2Zza3Zuzc4hzg7OLnm3DdH1vk1_P3Jd1Tq7Z47vuZSlfk3xnwRvmr8A8sSlBw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1412479786</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Can a creeping segment become a monitor before destructive major earthquakes?</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Kutoglu, H. S. ; Gormus, K. S. ; Deguchi, T. ; Koksal, E. ; Kemaldere, H. ; Gundogdu, O.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kutoglu, H. S. ; Gormus, K. S. ; Deguchi, T. ; Koksal, E. ; Kemaldere, H. ; Gundogdu, O.</creatorcontrib><description>There are few places in the world to monitor aseismic creep. One of them is the Ismetpasa segment of the North Anatolian Fault. The observations in the Ismetpasa showed that the creep rate progressively decreased along the 40 years before the 1999 Kocaeli-Golcuk (Mw = 7.6) earthquake and then started increasing. This phenomenon might be a systematic of the creeping segments. If it is the case, this behavior can be utilized for early warning before the expected major earthquake in the Marmara Sea. In this study, the creep rate of the segment has been studied by GPS and InSAR technologies. The results showed that the rate has decreased to 1.3 cm a year. This result might be an indication of stress starting increase. If the segment retains the decreasing trend and it is ceased by a major earthquake, it would be a proof of the relationship between the creep process and the earthquakes. Then, the creep process might be utilized for early warning.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0921-030X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0840</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11069-012-0466-0</identifier><identifier>CODEN: NAHZEL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Civil Engineering ; Creep (materials) ; Creep rate ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Earthquakes ; Earthquakes, seismology ; Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics ; Environmental Management ; Environmental policy ; Exact sciences and technology ; Faults ; Geodetics ; Geophysics/Geodesy ; Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences ; Global positioning systems ; GPS ; Hydrogeology ; Internal geophysics ; Monitors ; Natural Hazards ; Natural hazards: prediction, damages, etc ; Original Paper ; Plate tectonics ; Risk assessment ; Segments ; Seismic activity ; Seismic phenomena ; Technology ; Warning</subject><ispartof>Natural hazards (Dordrecht), 2013-02, Vol.65 (3), p.2161-2173</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012</rights><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a468t-f93fb1f49107e3294b92afa5b1e22e33be20094c9b40baf4de5830fc80672c63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a468t-f93fb1f49107e3294b92afa5b1e22e33be20094c9b40baf4de5830fc80672c63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27865,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=27587797$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kutoglu, H. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gormus, K. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deguchi, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koksal, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kemaldere, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gundogdu, O.</creatorcontrib><title>Can a creeping segment become a monitor before destructive major earthquakes?</title><title>Natural hazards (Dordrecht)</title><addtitle>Nat Hazards</addtitle><description>There are few places in the world to monitor aseismic creep. One of them is the Ismetpasa segment of the North Anatolian Fault. The observations in the Ismetpasa showed that the creep rate progressively decreased along the 40 years before the 1999 Kocaeli-Golcuk (Mw = 7.6) earthquake and then started increasing. This phenomenon might be a systematic of the creeping segments. If it is the case, this behavior can be utilized for early warning before the expected major earthquake in the Marmara Sea. In this study, the creep rate of the segment has been studied by GPS and InSAR technologies. The results showed that the rate has decreased to 1.3 cm a year. This result might be an indication of stress starting increase. If the segment retains the decreasing trend and it is ceased by a major earthquake, it would be a proof of the relationship between the creep process and the earthquakes. Then, the creep process might be utilized for early warning.</description><subject>Civil Engineering</subject><subject>Creep (materials)</subject><subject>Creep rate</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Earthquakes</subject><subject>Earthquakes, seismology</subject><subject>Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Environmental policy</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Faults</subject><subject>Geodetics</subject><subject>Geophysics/Geodesy</subject><subject>Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Global positioning systems</subject><subject>GPS</subject><subject>Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Internal geophysics</subject><subject>Monitors</subject><subject>Natural Hazards</subject><subject>Natural hazards: prediction, damages, etc</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Plate tectonics</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Segments</subject><subject>Seismic activity</subject><subject>Seismic phenomena</subject><subject>Technology</subject><subject>Warning</subject><issn>0921-030X</issn><issn>1573-0840</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUFr3DAQhUVJoZttfkBvhhDIxemMJEvWqYQlbQMJueSQm5CV0dabtb2R7EL_fWR2KSUQmtOA3qc3b3iMfUG4QAD9NSGCMiUgL0EqVcIHtsBKixJqCUdsAYZjCQIePrHjlDYAiIqbBbtdub5whY9Eu7ZfF4nWHfVj0ZAfOspKN_TtOMT8EIZIxSOlMU5-bH9T0blNFsjF8dfz5J4offvMPga3TXRymEt2__3qfvWzvLn7cb26vCmdVPVYBiNCg0EaBE2CG9kY7oKrGiTOSYiGOICR3jQSGhfkI1W1gOBrUJp7JZbsfG-7i8PzlBPZrk2etlvX0zAli0pjZSqpzf9RyY2qhEB4B4pGaFFXs-vpK3QzTLHPJ88Uz4t1PcfEPeXjkFKkYHex7Vz8YxHs3Jrdt2Zza3Zuzc4hzg7OLnm3DdH1vk1_P3Jd1Tq7Z47vuZSlfk3xnwRvmr8A8sSlBw</recordid><startdate>20130201</startdate><enddate>20130201</enddate><creator>Kutoglu, H. S.</creator><creator>Gormus, K. S.</creator><creator>Deguchi, T.</creator><creator>Koksal, E.</creator><creator>Kemaldere, H.</creator><creator>Gundogdu, O.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7SM</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130201</creationdate><title>Can a creeping segment become a monitor before destructive major earthquakes?</title><author>Kutoglu, H. S. ; Gormus, K. S. ; Deguchi, T. ; Koksal, E. ; Kemaldere, H. ; Gundogdu, O.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a468t-f93fb1f49107e3294b92afa5b1e22e33be20094c9b40baf4de5830fc80672c63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Civil Engineering</topic><topic>Creep (materials)</topic><topic>Creep rate</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Earthquakes</topic><topic>Earthquakes, seismology</topic><topic>Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Environmental policy</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Faults</topic><topic>Geodetics</topic><topic>Geophysics/Geodesy</topic><topic>Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Global positioning systems</topic><topic>GPS</topic><topic>Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Internal geophysics</topic><topic>Monitors</topic><topic>Natural Hazards</topic><topic>Natural hazards: prediction, damages, etc</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Plate tectonics</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Segments</topic><topic>Seismic activity</topic><topic>Seismic phenomena</topic><topic>Technology</topic><topic>Warning</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kutoglu, H. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gormus, K. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deguchi, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koksal, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kemaldere, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gundogdu, O.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Earthquake Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Natural hazards (Dordrecht)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kutoglu, H. S.</au><au>Gormus, K. S.</au><au>Deguchi, T.</au><au>Koksal, E.</au><au>Kemaldere, H.</au><au>Gundogdu, O.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Can a creeping segment become a monitor before destructive major earthquakes?</atitle><jtitle>Natural hazards (Dordrecht)</jtitle><stitle>Nat Hazards</stitle><date>2013-02-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>65</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>2161</spage><epage>2173</epage><pages>2161-2173</pages><issn>0921-030X</issn><eissn>1573-0840</eissn><coden>NAHZEL</coden><abstract>There are few places in the world to monitor aseismic creep. One of them is the Ismetpasa segment of the North Anatolian Fault. The observations in the Ismetpasa showed that the creep rate progressively decreased along the 40 years before the 1999 Kocaeli-Golcuk (Mw = 7.6) earthquake and then started increasing. This phenomenon might be a systematic of the creeping segments. If it is the case, this behavior can be utilized for early warning before the expected major earthquake in the Marmara Sea. In this study, the creep rate of the segment has been studied by GPS and InSAR technologies. The results showed that the rate has decreased to 1.3 cm a year. This result might be an indication of stress starting increase. If the segment retains the decreasing trend and it is ceased by a major earthquake, it would be a proof of the relationship between the creep process and the earthquakes. Then, the creep process might be utilized for early warning.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s11069-012-0466-0</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0921-030X |
ispartof | Natural hazards (Dordrecht), 2013-02, Vol.65 (3), p.2161-2173 |
issn | 0921-030X 1573-0840 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1671595479 |
source | PAIS Index; Springer Link |
subjects | Civil Engineering Creep (materials) Creep rate Earth and Environmental Science Earth Sciences Earth, ocean, space Earthquakes Earthquakes, seismology Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics Environmental Management Environmental policy Exact sciences and technology Faults Geodetics Geophysics/Geodesy Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences Global positioning systems GPS Hydrogeology Internal geophysics Monitors Natural Hazards Natural hazards: prediction, damages, etc Original Paper Plate tectonics Risk assessment Segments Seismic activity Seismic phenomena Technology Warning |
title | Can a creeping segment become a monitor before destructive major earthquakes? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T15%3A59%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Can%20a%20creeping%20segment%20become%20a%20monitor%20before%20destructive%20major%20earthquakes?&rft.jtitle=Natural%20hazards%20(Dordrecht)&rft.au=Kutoglu,%20H.%20S.&rft.date=2013-02-01&rft.volume=65&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=2161&rft.epage=2173&rft.pages=2161-2173&rft.issn=0921-030X&rft.eissn=1573-0840&rft.coden=NAHZEL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11069-012-0466-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3028641301%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a468t-f93fb1f49107e3294b92afa5b1e22e33be20094c9b40baf4de5830fc80672c63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1412479786&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |