The Geography of Ethnocentrism

Hammond and Axelrod use an evolutionary agent-based model to explore the development of ethnocentrism. They argue that local interactions permit groups, relying on in-group favoritism, to overcome the Nash equilibrium of the prisoner's dilemma and sustain in-group cooperation. This article show...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of conflict resolution 2015-04, Vol.59 (3), p.510-527
Main Author: Bausch, Andrew W.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Cooperation
Ethnocentrism
Game theory
Geography
Group dynamics
Nash equilibrium
Prisoner's dilemma
Social interaction
Studies
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Hammond and Axelrod use an evolutionary agent-based model to explore the development of ethnocentrism. They argue that local interactions permit groups, relying on in-group favoritism, to overcome the Nash equilibrium of the prisoner's dilemma and sustain in-group cooperation. This article shows that higher levels of cooperation evolve when groups are dropped from the model, breaking the link between ethnocentrism and cooperation. This article then generalizes Hammond and Axelrod's model by parameterizing the underlying geographical assumptions they make about the evolutionary environment. This more general model shows that their findings are sensitive to these assumptions and that small changes to the assumed geography of reproduction significantly affect the probabilities of finding "ethnocentric" behaviors. The model presented here indicates that it is not local interactions, per se, but settings where interactions are highly likely to be with close relatives that lead to "ethnocentrism" as modeled by Hammond and Axelrod.
ISSN:0022-0027
1552-8766
DOI:10.1177/0022002713515401