The challenge of economic growth for sustainable production landscapes

• Published in: Sustainability science 2015-04, Vol.10 (2), p.219-230
• Main Author: Hunt, Lesley
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Agricultural economics; Agricultural policy; Agricultural practices; Agricultural production; Agricultural research; Beef; Climate Change Management and Policy; Earth and Environmental Science; Economic growth; Economics; Environment; Environmental Economics; Environmental Management; Extensive farming; Extreme weather; Family farms; Farmers; Farming; Farms; Food; Funding; Human influences; Landscape Ecology; Natural resources; Productivity; Public Health; Risk taking; Sheep; Special Feature: Review Article; Statistical analysis; Sustainability; Sustainable agriculture; Sustainable Development; Sustainable production; Weather patterns
• ISSN: 1862-4065; 1862-4057
• DOI: 10.1007/s11625-014-0276-2

The New Zealand government narrowly frames farming policy to exert pressure on farmers to increase their contribution to the national economy by producing more agricultural products for export through adopting on-farm ‘best practice’. Simultaneously, farmers are under pressure by the government and the public to protect, if not enhance, the sustainability of their farming landscapes. These expectations are to be met in an environment of changing extreme weather patterns, increasing costs and financial uncertainty. Farmers’ response to their context was studied by analysis of what farmers actually do—their practices and outcomes of those practices—enabled through the collection of data from sheep/beef family farms undertaken over 8 years by the Agriculture Research Group on Sustainability. The outcomes of their practices, while sometimes visible in the landscape, became more apparent through a nuanced analysis of multiple data sources (quantitative and qualitative) which revealed the complexity involved in sustaining families, animals and landscapes. Farmers could be grouped into categories labelled developers or low performers, adaptable risk takers, organic conservers, extensive farmers and stable, continuous improvers, indicating the range of choices farmers make to meet their goals while carefully adapting their management of the natural resource base. Pressure to ‘change’ to fit politically driven agendas that overemphasise economic growth runs the risk of undervaluing what farmers already do and may limit the different ways they are able to balance their management of the sustainability, resilience and productivity of their production landscapes and farming businesses.