Loading…

Quality and safety impact on the provision of parenteral nutrition through introduction of a nutrition support team

Background/Objectives: Parenteral nutrition (PN) should be provided to the malnourished patient if enteral feeding is insufficient or unsafe. A nutrition support team (NST) may improve PN services. We compared the use and complications of hospital PN before and after the implementation of an NST. Su...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European journal of clinical nutrition 2014-12, Vol.68 (12), p.1294-1299
Main Authors: Hvas, C L, Farrer, K, Donaldson, E, Blackett, B, Lloyd, H, Forde, C, Garside, G, Paine, P, Lal, S
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background/Objectives: Parenteral nutrition (PN) should be provided to the malnourished patient if enteral feeding is insufficient or unsafe. A nutrition support team (NST) may improve PN services. We compared the use and complications of hospital PN before and after the implementation of an NST. Subjects/Methods: All inpatients referred for PN outside of the intensive care unit and the intestinal failure unit were prospectively included from 2009 to 2012. The NST was introduced in 2010. Quality improvement methodology was applied. Results: In 2009, a mean of 16 (limits of normal variation 4–28) patients were referred for PN each month. After introduction of the NST, this rose to 26 (10–42) referrals per month. The percentage of referrals where PN was not initiated increased from 5.3% in 2009 to 10.1% in 2012 ( P =0.03). This increase was restricted to teams that infrequently referred for PN, and enteral nutrition could replace PN in 31 of 51 patients (61%) as compared with 8 of 32 (25%) patients referred from teams that frequently referred for PN ( P =0.001). The frequency of PN started owing to an insufficient oral or enteral intake decreased from 11% to 3% ( P =0.01). The catheter-related bloodstream infection rate dropped from 6.7 to 0.7 episodes per 1000 catheter days ( P
ISSN:0954-3007
1476-5640
DOI:10.1038/ejcn.2014.186