Loading…
Empowerment and satisfaction in a multinational study of routine clinical practice
Objective Decision‐making between mental health clinicians and patients is under‐researched. We tested whether mental health patients are more satisfied with a decision made (i) using their preferred decision‐making style and (ii) with a clinician with the same decision‐making style preference. Meth...
Saved in:
Published in: | Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica 2015-05, Vol.131 (5), p.369-378 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Objective
Decision‐making between mental health clinicians and patients is under‐researched. We tested whether mental health patients are more satisfied with a decision made (i) using their preferred decision‐making style and (ii) with a clinician with the same decision‐making style preference.
Method
As part of the CEDAR Study (ISRCTN75841675), a convenience sample of 445 patients with severe mental illness from six European countries were assessed for desired clinical decision‐making style (rated by patients and paired clinicians), decision‐specific experienced style and satisfaction.
Results
Patients who experienced more involvement in decision‐making than they desired rated higher satisfaction (OR = 2.47, P = 0.005, 95% CI 1.32–4.63). Decisions made with clinicians whose decision‐making style preference was for more active involvement than the patient preference were rated with higher satisfaction (OR = 3.17, P = 0.003, 95% CI 1.48–6.82).
Conclusion
More active involvement in decision‐making than the patient stated as desired was associated with higher satisfaction. A clinical orientation towards empowering, rather than shared, decision‐making may maximise satisfaction. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0001-690X 1600-0447 |
DOI: | 10.1111/acps.12365 |