Loading…
Procedural failure of chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention: Insights from a multicenter US registry
Background The hybrid approach to chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has significantly increased procedural success rates, yet some cases still fail. We sought to evaluate the causes of failure in a contemporary CTO PCI registry. Methods We examined 380 consecutiv...
Saved in:
Published in: | Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions 2015-06, Vol.85 (7), p.1115-1122 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Background
The hybrid approach to chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has significantly increased procedural success rates, yet some cases still fail. We sought to evaluate the causes of failure in a contemporary CTO PCI registry.
Methods
We examined 380 consecutive patients who underwent CTO‐PCI at 4 high volume CTO PCI centers in the United States using the “hybrid” approach. Clinical, angiographic, complication, and efficiency outcomes were compared between successful and failed cases. Failed cases were individually reviewed by an independent reviewer to determine the cause of failure.
Results
Procedural success was 91.3%. Compared with patients in whom CTO PCI was successful, those in whom CTO PCI failed had similar baseline clinical characteristics, but were more likely to have longer occlusion length, more tortuosity, more proximal cap ambiguity and blunt stump, and higher mean J‐CTO scores (2.8 ± 1.1 vs. 3.5 ± 1.0, P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1522-1946 1522-726X |
DOI: | 10.1002/ccd.25807 |