Loading…

Study of the effects of the chaser in push–pull tracer tests by using temporal moment analysis

•The influence of a chaser on the push–pull test breakthrough curve was determined.•The application of a chaser affects the main peak breakthrough.•The application of a chaser does not affect the tailing of the breakthrough curve.•Conclusions and recommendations about the application of chaser are g...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Geothermics 2015-03, Vol.54, p.43-53
Main Authors: Hebig, K.H., Zeilfelder, S., Ito, N., Machida, I., Marui, A., Scheytt, T.J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•The influence of a chaser on the push–pull test breakthrough curve was determined.•The application of a chaser affects the main peak breakthrough.•The application of a chaser does not affect the tailing of the breakthrough curve.•Conclusions and recommendations about the application of chaser are given.•Easy and fast method to determine the optimal chaser volume for push–pull tests. “Push–pull” tracer tests are a suitable tracer test method for hydrochemical characterization of an aquifer in a single-well setting (e.g. in deep geothermal systems). A known amount of selected solutes as conservative and reactive tracers is injected into the aquifer (“push”) and afterwards extracted (“pull”). In many cases, a so-called “chaser”, which is just original groundwater without any added solutes, is injected directly after the injection of the test solution. Its objective is to push the test solution out of the borehole into the aquifer and therefore to minimize the influence of the gravel pack on the shape of the breakthrough curve. The influence of the chaser on the tracer breakthrough curve is unknown so far. Also, the determination of the appropriate volume for the chaser is a difficult task if at all applied. A first experiment was conducted with the objective to compare three push–pull tests with similar injection volumes, two tests with and one without a chaser. Results show that the application of a chaser lowers the main peak concentration. However, it does not alter the tailing of the breakthrough curve nor does it have a negative influence on tracer mass recovery. In a second experiment, a new method was developed to determine the optimal chaser volume by testing seven different chaser injection volumes combined with temporal moment analysis. As a result, the application of a chaser is recommended, when reactions of injected solutes within the open well or the gravel pack should be avoided. If a chaser is used, the new method mentioned above can easily be used to determine the required chaser injection volume. The experiments were conducted at the Hamasato test site in Horonobe (Hokkaido, Japan).
ISSN:0375-6505
1879-3576
DOI:10.1016/j.geothermics.2014.11.004