An Assessment of Hospital-Based Palliative Care in Maryland: Infrastructure, Barriers, and Opportunities

• Published in: Journal of pain and symptom management 2015-06, Vol.49 (6), p.1102-1108
• Main Authors: Gibbs, Kenneth D., PhD, MPH, Mahon, Margaret M., PhD, CRNP, Truss, Meredith, MPP, Eyring, Kira, BS
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Anesthesia & Perioperative Care; barriers and supports; departments of health; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; Hospitals - statistics & numerical data; Humans; infrastructure; Interviews as Topic; Legislation, Hospital - statistics & numerical data; Maryland; Pain Medicine; Palliative care; Palliative Care - legislation & jurisprudence; Palliative Care - psychology; Palliative Care - statistics & numerical data; Physicians - psychology; state-level data
• ISSN: 0885-3924; 1873-6513
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2014.12.004

Abstract Context Maryland recently passed legislation mandating that hospitals with more than 50 beds have palliative care (PC) programs. Although the state's health agency can play a key role in ensuring successful implementation of this measure, there is little actionable information from which it can guide resource allocation for enhancing PC delivery statewide. Objectives To assess the PC infrastructure at Maryland's 46 community-based nonspecialty hospitals and to describe providers' perspectives on barriers to PC and supports that could enhance PC delivery. Methods Data on PC programs were collected using two mechanisms. First, a survey was sent to all 46 community-based hospital chief executive officers by the Maryland Cancer Collaborative. The Maryland Health Care Commission provided supplementary survey and semistructured interview data. Results Twenty-eight hospitals (60.9%) provided information on their PC services. Eighty-nine percent of these hospitals reported the presence of a structured PC program. The profile of services provided by PC programs was largely conserved across hospital geography and size. The most common barriers reported to PC delivery were lack of knowledge among patients and/or families and lack of physician buy-in; most hospitals reported that networks and/or conferences to promote best practice sharing in PC would be useful supports. Conclusion Systematic collection of state-level PC infrastructure data can be used to guide state health agencies' understanding of extant resources and challenges, using those data to determine resource allocation to promote the timely receipt of PC for patients and families.