Training specificity and transfer in time and distance estimation

• Published in: Memory & cognition 2015-07, Vol.43 (5), p.736-747
• Main Authors: Healy, Alice F., Tack, Lindsay Anderson, Schneider, Vivian I., Barshi, Immanuel
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Behavioral Science and Psychology; Cognition & reasoning; Cognitive Psychology; Cues; Distance Perception - physiology; Experiments; Humans; Intelligence tests; Learning; Memory; Psychology; Skills; Time Perception - physiology; Transfer (Psychology) - physiology; Young Adult
• ISSN: 0090-502X; 1532-5946
• DOI: 10.3758/s13421-015-0503-9

Learning is often specific to the conditions of training, making it important to identify which aspects of the testing environment are crucial to be matched in the training environment. In the present study, we examined training specificity in time and distance estimation tasks that differed only in the focus of processing (FOP). External spatial cues were provided for the distance estimation task and for the time estimation task in one condition, but not in another. The presence of a concurrent alphabet secondary task was manipulated during training and testing in all estimation conditions in Experiment 1 . For distance as well as for time estimation in both conditions, training of the primary estimation task was found to be specific to the presence of the secondary task. In Experiments 2 and 3 , we examined transfer between one estimation task and another, with no secondary task in either case. When all conditions were equal aside from the FOP instructions, including the presence of external spatial cues, Experiment 2 showed “transfer” between tasks, suggesting that training might not be specific to the FOP. When the external spatial cues were removed from the time estimation task, Experiment 3 showed no transfer between time and distance estimations, suggesting that external task cues influenced the procedures used in the estimation tasks.