Loading…

Theory of planned behavior and adherence in chronic illness: a meta-analysis

Social-cognitive models such as the theory of planned behavior have demonstrated efficacy in predicting behavior, but few studies have examined the theory as a predictor of treatment adherence in chronic illness. We tested the efficacy of the theory for predicting adherence to treatment in chronic i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of behavioral medicine 2015-08, Vol.38 (4), p.673-688
Main Authors: Rich, Antonia, Brandes, Kim, Mullan, Barbara, Hagger, Martin S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c547t-c76014cdc1f6b9b3da56dfe297d7a09ff54252faabca8e55bb19e283d89186613
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c547t-c76014cdc1f6b9b3da56dfe297d7a09ff54252faabca8e55bb19e283d89186613
container_end_page 688
container_issue 4
container_start_page 673
container_title Journal of behavioral medicine
container_volume 38
creator Rich, Antonia
Brandes, Kim
Mullan, Barbara
Hagger, Martin S.
description Social-cognitive models such as the theory of planned behavior have demonstrated efficacy in predicting behavior, but few studies have examined the theory as a predictor of treatment adherence in chronic illness. We tested the efficacy of the theory for predicting adherence to treatment in chronic illness across multiple studies. A database search identified 27 studies, meeting inclusion criteria. Averaged intercorrelations among theory variables were computed corrected for sampling error using random-effects meta-analysis. Path-analysis using the meta-analytically derived correlations was used to test theory hypotheses and effects of moderators. The theory explained 33 and 9 % of the variance in intention and adherence behavior respectively. Theoretically consistent patterns of effects among the attitude, subjective norm, perceived behavioral control, intention and behavior constructs were found with small-to-medium effect sizes. Effect sizes were invariant across behavior and measurement type. Although results support theory predictions, effect sizes were small, particularly for the intention-behavior relationship.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10865-015-9644-3
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1695184147</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A436974864</galeid><sourcerecordid>A436974864</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c547t-c76014cdc1f6b9b3da56dfe297d7a09ff54252faabca8e55bb19e283d89186613</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUuLWyEYhqW0dNJpf0A3ReimG6fq8XLsbhh6g0A307V49DNxONFUk0L-_ZhmeiXFhaDP--Lng9BLRq8YpfptY3RUklAmiVFCkOERWjCpBzJIzh6jBWWKEq2ZvEDPWrujlCojzFN0waUxghq5QMvbNZR6wCXi7exyhoAnWLvvqVTscsAurKFC9oBTxn5dS04ep3nO0No77PAGdo647OZDS-05ehLd3ODFw36Jvn54f3vziSy_fPx8c70kXgq9I14ryoQPnkU1mWkITqoQgRsdtKMmRim45NG5ybsRpJwmZoCPQxgNG5ViwyV6c-rd1vJtD21nN6l5mPsAUPbNMmUkGwUTuqOv_0Hvyr729_6ghOFcU_6bWrkZbMqx7Krzx1J7LQZltBiV6BQ5Q60gQ3VzyRBTP_6LvzrD9xVgk_zZADsFfC2tVYh2W9PG1YNl1B6N25Nx243bo3E79MyrhwH30wbCr8RPxR3gJ6D1q7yC-scP_Lf1Hh5Fs2U</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1694922702</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Theory of planned behavior and adherence in chronic illness: a meta-analysis</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Springer Nature</source><source>Sociology Collection</source><creator>Rich, Antonia ; Brandes, Kim ; Mullan, Barbara ; Hagger, Martin S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Rich, Antonia ; Brandes, Kim ; Mullan, Barbara ; Hagger, Martin S.</creatorcontrib><description>Social-cognitive models such as the theory of planned behavior have demonstrated efficacy in predicting behavior, but few studies have examined the theory as a predictor of treatment adherence in chronic illness. We tested the efficacy of the theory for predicting adherence to treatment in chronic illness across multiple studies. A database search identified 27 studies, meeting inclusion criteria. Averaged intercorrelations among theory variables were computed corrected for sampling error using random-effects meta-analysis. Path-analysis using the meta-analytically derived correlations was used to test theory hypotheses and effects of moderators. The theory explained 33 and 9 % of the variance in intention and adherence behavior respectively. Theoretically consistent patterns of effects among the attitude, subjective norm, perceived behavioral control, intention and behavior constructs were found with small-to-medium effect sizes. Effect sizes were invariant across behavior and measurement type. Although results support theory predictions, effect sizes were small, particularly for the intention-behavior relationship.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0160-7715</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-3521</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10865-015-9644-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25994095</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Attitude ; Behavioral assessment ; Chronic Disease - psychology ; Family Medicine ; General Practice ; Health Psychology ; Humans ; Intention ; Medical care ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Netherlands ; Patient Compliance - psychology ; Psychological Theory ; Systematic review</subject><ispartof>Journal of behavioral medicine, 2015-08, Vol.38 (4), p.673-688</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2015 Springer</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c547t-c76014cdc1f6b9b3da56dfe297d7a09ff54252faabca8e55bb19e283d89186613</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c547t-c76014cdc1f6b9b3da56dfe297d7a09ff54252faabca8e55bb19e283d89186613</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1694922702/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1694922702?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12846,21394,21395,27924,27925,30999,33611,33612,34530,34531,43733,44115,74093,74511</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25994095$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rich, Antonia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brandes, Kim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mullan, Barbara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hagger, Martin S.</creatorcontrib><title>Theory of planned behavior and adherence in chronic illness: a meta-analysis</title><title>Journal of behavioral medicine</title><addtitle>J Behav Med</addtitle><addtitle>J Behav Med</addtitle><description>Social-cognitive models such as the theory of planned behavior have demonstrated efficacy in predicting behavior, but few studies have examined the theory as a predictor of treatment adherence in chronic illness. We tested the efficacy of the theory for predicting adherence to treatment in chronic illness across multiple studies. A database search identified 27 studies, meeting inclusion criteria. Averaged intercorrelations among theory variables were computed corrected for sampling error using random-effects meta-analysis. Path-analysis using the meta-analytically derived correlations was used to test theory hypotheses and effects of moderators. The theory explained 33 and 9 % of the variance in intention and adherence behavior respectively. Theoretically consistent patterns of effects among the attitude, subjective norm, perceived behavioral control, intention and behavior constructs were found with small-to-medium effect sizes. Effect sizes were invariant across behavior and measurement type. Although results support theory predictions, effect sizes were small, particularly for the intention-behavior relationship.</description><subject>Attitude</subject><subject>Behavioral assessment</subject><subject>Chronic Disease - psychology</subject><subject>Family Medicine</subject><subject>General Practice</subject><subject>Health Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intention</subject><subject>Medical care</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Netherlands</subject><subject>Patient Compliance - psychology</subject><subject>Psychological Theory</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><issn>0160-7715</issn><issn>1573-3521</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>HEHIP</sourceid><sourceid>M2S</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUuLWyEYhqW0dNJpf0A3ReimG6fq8XLsbhh6g0A307V49DNxONFUk0L-_ZhmeiXFhaDP--Lng9BLRq8YpfptY3RUklAmiVFCkOERWjCpBzJIzh6jBWWKEq2ZvEDPWrujlCojzFN0waUxghq5QMvbNZR6wCXi7exyhoAnWLvvqVTscsAurKFC9oBTxn5dS04ep3nO0No77PAGdo647OZDS-05ehLd3ODFw36Jvn54f3vziSy_fPx8c70kXgq9I14ryoQPnkU1mWkITqoQgRsdtKMmRim45NG5ybsRpJwmZoCPQxgNG5ViwyV6c-rd1vJtD21nN6l5mPsAUPbNMmUkGwUTuqOv_0Hvyr729_6ghOFcU_6bWrkZbMqx7Krzx1J7LQZltBiV6BQ5Q60gQ3VzyRBTP_6LvzrD9xVgk_zZADsFfC2tVYh2W9PG1YNl1B6N25Nx243bo3E79MyrhwH30wbCr8RPxR3gJ6D1q7yC-scP_Lf1Hh5Fs2U</recordid><startdate>20150801</startdate><enddate>20150801</enddate><creator>Rich, Antonia</creator><creator>Brandes, Kim</creator><creator>Mullan, Barbara</creator><creator>Hagger, Martin S.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150801</creationdate><title>Theory of planned behavior and adherence in chronic illness: a meta-analysis</title><author>Rich, Antonia ; Brandes, Kim ; Mullan, Barbara ; Hagger, Martin S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c547t-c76014cdc1f6b9b3da56dfe297d7a09ff54252faabca8e55bb19e283d89186613</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Attitude</topic><topic>Behavioral assessment</topic><topic>Chronic Disease - psychology</topic><topic>Family Medicine</topic><topic>General Practice</topic><topic>Health Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intention</topic><topic>Medical care</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Netherlands</topic><topic>Patient Compliance - psychology</topic><topic>Psychological Theory</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rich, Antonia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brandes, Kim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mullan, Barbara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hagger, Martin S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of behavioral medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rich, Antonia</au><au>Brandes, Kim</au><au>Mullan, Barbara</au><au>Hagger, Martin S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Theory of planned behavior and adherence in chronic illness: a meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of behavioral medicine</jtitle><stitle>J Behav Med</stitle><addtitle>J Behav Med</addtitle><date>2015-08-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>673</spage><epage>688</epage><pages>673-688</pages><issn>0160-7715</issn><eissn>1573-3521</eissn><abstract>Social-cognitive models such as the theory of planned behavior have demonstrated efficacy in predicting behavior, but few studies have examined the theory as a predictor of treatment adherence in chronic illness. We tested the efficacy of the theory for predicting adherence to treatment in chronic illness across multiple studies. A database search identified 27 studies, meeting inclusion criteria. Averaged intercorrelations among theory variables were computed corrected for sampling error using random-effects meta-analysis. Path-analysis using the meta-analytically derived correlations was used to test theory hypotheses and effects of moderators. The theory explained 33 and 9 % of the variance in intention and adherence behavior respectively. Theoretically consistent patterns of effects among the attitude, subjective norm, perceived behavioral control, intention and behavior constructs were found with small-to-medium effect sizes. Effect sizes were invariant across behavior and measurement type. Although results support theory predictions, effect sizes were small, particularly for the intention-behavior relationship.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>25994095</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10865-015-9644-3</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0160-7715
ispartof Journal of behavioral medicine, 2015-08, Vol.38 (4), p.673-688
issn 0160-7715
1573-3521
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1695184147
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Social Science Premium Collection; Springer Nature; Sociology Collection
subjects Attitude
Behavioral assessment
Chronic Disease - psychology
Family Medicine
General Practice
Health Psychology
Humans
Intention
Medical care
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Netherlands
Patient Compliance - psychology
Psychological Theory
Systematic review
title Theory of planned behavior and adherence in chronic illness: a meta-analysis
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T02%3A54%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Theory%20of%20planned%20behavior%20and%20adherence%20in%20chronic%20illness:%20a%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20behavioral%20medicine&rft.au=Rich,%20Antonia&rft.date=2015-08-01&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=673&rft.epage=688&rft.pages=673-688&rft.issn=0160-7715&rft.eissn=1573-3521&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10865-015-9644-3&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA436974864%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c547t-c76014cdc1f6b9b3da56dfe297d7a09ff54252faabca8e55bb19e283d89186613%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1694922702&rft_id=info:pmid/25994095&rft_galeid=A436974864&rfr_iscdi=true