Quantification of six cannabinoids and metabolites in oral fluid by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry

• Published in: Drug testing and analysis 2015-08, Vol.7 (8), p.684-694
• Main Authors: Desrosiers, Nathalie A., Scheidweiler, Karl B., Huestis, Marilyn A.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Cannabidiol - analysis; Cannabidiol - metabolism; cannabinoids; Cannabinoids - analysis; Cannabinoids - metabolism; Chromatography, Liquid - methods; Dronabinol - analogs & derivatives; Dronabinol - analysis; Dronabinol - metabolism; Humans; LC-MS/MS; Limit of Detection; oral fluid; Saliva - chemistry; Solid Phase Extraction - methods; Tandem Mass Spectrometry - methods; THC; THCCOOH
• ISSN: 1942-7603; 1942-7611
• DOI: 10.1002/dta.1753

Δ9‐Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) is the most commonly analyzed cannabinoid in oral fluid (OF); however, its metabolite 11‐nor‐9‐carboxy‐THC (THCCOOH) offers the advantage of documenting active consumption, as it is not detected in cannabis smoke. Analytical challenges such as low (ng/L) THCCOOH OF concentrations hampered routine OF THCCOOH monitoring. Presence of minor cannabinoids like cannabidiol and cannabinol offer the advantage of identifying recent cannabis intake. Published OF cannabinoids methods have limitations, including few analytes and lengthy derivatization. We developed and validated a sensitive and specific liquid chromatography‐tandem mass spectrometry (LC‐MS/MS) method for THC, its metabolites, 11‐hydroxy‐THC and THCCOOH quantification, and other natural cannabinoids including tetrahydrocannabivarin (THCV), cannabidiol (CBD), and cannabigerol (CBG) in 1 mL OF collected with the Quantisal device. After solid‐phase extraction, chromatography was performed on a Selectra PFPP column with a 0.15% formic acid in water and acetonitrile gradient with a 0.5 mL/min flow rate. All analytes were monitored in positive mode atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (APCI) with multiple reaction monitoring. Limits of quantification were 15 ng/L THCCOOH and 0.2 µg/L for all other analytes. Linear ranges extended to 3750 ng/L THCCOOH, 100 µg/L THC, and 50 µg/L for all other analytes. Inter‐day analytical recoveries (bias) and imprecision at low, mid, and high quality control (QC) concentrations were 88.7‐107.3% and 2.3‐6.7%, respectively (n = 20). Mean extraction efficiencies and matrix effects evaluated at low and high QC were 75.9–86.1% and 8.4–99.4%, respectively. This method will be highly useful for workplace, criminal justice, drug treatment and driving under the influence of cannabis OF testing. Published 2014. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA. We developed and validated a sensitive and specific LC‐MS/MS method for THC, 11‐hydroxy‐THC, THCCOOH, tetrahydrocannabivarin, cannabidiol, and cannabigerol quantification from 1 mL OF collected with the Quantisal device. Limits of quantification were 15 ng/L THCCOOH and 0.2 µg/L for all other analytes. Linear ranges extended to 3750 ng/L THCCOOH, 100 µg/L THC, and 50 µg/L for all other analytes. Inter‐day analytical recoveries (bias) and imprecision at low, mid, and high quality control (QC) concentrations were 88.7–107.3% and 2.3–6.7%, respectively (n = 20).