Vibrotactile Coding Capacities of Spinocervical Tract Neurons in the Cat

• Published in: Journal of neurophysiology 2006-03, Vol.95 (3), p.1465-1477
• Main Authors: Sahai, V, Mahns, D. A, Perkins, N. M, Robinson, L, Rowe, M. J
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Action Potentials - physiology; Afferent Pathways - physiology; Animals; Cats; Electric Stimulation; Mechanoreceptors - physiology; Nerve Net - physiology; Neurons, Afferent - physiology; Physical Stimulation; Spinal Cord - physiology; Touch - physiology; Vibration
• ISSN: 0022-3077; 1522-1598
• DOI: 10.1152/jn.00484.2005

Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, School of Medical Sciences, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia Submitted 11 May 2005; accepted in final form 23 November 2005 The response characteristics and tactile coding capacities of individual dorsal horn neurons, in particular, those of the spinocervical tract (SCT), have been examined in the anesthetized cat. Twenty one of 38 neurons studied were confirmed SCT neurons based on antidromic activation procedures. All had tactile receptive fields on the hairy skin of the hindlimb. Most (29/38) could also be activated transynaptically by electrical stimulation of the cervical dorsal columns, suggesting that a common set of tactile primary afferent fibers may provide the input for both the dorsal column-lemniscal pathway and for parallel ascending pathways, such as the SCT. All but 3 of the 38 neurons studied displayed a pure dynamic sensitivity to controlled tactile stimuli but were unable to sustain their responsiveness throughout 1s trains of vibration at vibration frequencies exceeding 5–10 Hz. Stimulus-response relations revealed a very limited capacity of individual SCT neurons to signal, in a graded way, the intensity parameter of the vibrotactile stimulus. Furthermore, because of their inability to respond on a cycle-by-cycle pattern at vibration frequencies >5–10 Hz, these neurons were unable to provide any useful signal of vibration frequency beyond the very narrow bandwidth of 5–10 Hz. Similar limitations were observed in the responsiveness of these neurons to repetitive forms of antidromic and transynaptic inputs generated by electrical stimulation of the spinal cord. In summary, the observed limitations on the vibrotactile bandwidth of SCT neurons and on the precision and fidelity of their temporal signaling, suggest that SCT neurons could serve as little more than coarse event detectors in tactile sensibility, in contrast to DCN neurons the bandwidth of vibrotactile responsiveness of which may extend beyond 400 Hz and is therefore broader by 40–50 times than that of SCT neurons. Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: M. J. Rowe, School of Medical Sciences, The University of New South Wales, Sydney N.S.W. 2052, Australia (E-mail: M.Rowe{at}unsw.edu.au )