Loading…
The derived neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio predicts poor clinical outcome in soft tissue sarcoma patients
Abstract Background Inflammation plays an important role in tumor proliferation and survival in cancer patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic impact of the pre-operative–derived neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (dNLR) in a large cohort of soft tissue sarcoma (STS) patients afte...
Saved in:
Published in: | The American journal of surgery 2015-07, Vol.210 (1), p.111-116 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Abstract Background Inflammation plays an important role in tumor proliferation and survival in cancer patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic impact of the pre-operative–derived neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (dNLR) in a large cohort of soft tissue sarcoma (STS) patients after curative surgical resection. Methods The impact of preoperative dNLR on disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in retrospectively evaluated 340 STS patients was assessed using Kaplan–Meier curves and Cox proportional models. Results Applying receiver operating curve analysis, we determined a cut-off value of 2.39 for the dNLR to be optimal for discrimination of patients' survival in the whole cohort. Kaplan–Meier curves revealed a dNLR greater than or equal to 2.39 as a marker for decreased DFS ( P = .031) and OS ( P = .007, log-rank test) in STS patients. In multivariate analysis, increased dNLR was significantly associated with poor OS (hazard ratio 1.60, 95% confidence interval 1.07 to 2.40, P = .022). Conclusions This study demonstrates that preoperative dNLR might represent a well-correlated surrogate marker for the widely validated NLR. The dNLR is easily obtainable and can provide important information for individual risk assessment in clinical trials. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0002-9610 1879-1883 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.10.021 |