An evaluation of resistance to change with unconditioned and conditioned reinforcers

• Published in: Journal of applied behavior analysis 2015-09, Vol.48 (3), p.643-662
• Main Authors: Vargo, Kristina K., Ringdahl, Joel E.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Behavior; behavioral momentum theory; Child, Preschool; Choice Behavior - physiology; Conditioning (Psychology) - physiology; distraction; Endangered & extinct species; Experiments; Extinction; Extinction, Psychological - physiology; Feedback (Response); Female; Food; Humans; Male; Persistence; Reinforcement (Psychology); Reinforcement Schedule; Researchers; resistance to change; Response rates; Studies; Theory; unconditioned and conditioned reinforcement; Variables
• ISSN: 0021-8855; 1938-3703
• DOI: 10.1002/jaba.226

Several reinforcer‐related variables influence a response's resistance to change (Nevin, 1974). Reinforcer type (i.e., conditioned or unconditioned) is a reinforcer‐related variable that has not been studied with humans but may have clinical implications. In Experiment 1, we identified unconditioned and conditioned reinforcers of equal preference. In Experiments 2, 3, and 4, we reinforced participants' behavior during a baseline phase using a multiple variable‐interval (VI) 30‐s VI 30‐s schedule with either conditioned (i.e., token) or unconditioned (i.e., food; one type of reinforcement in each component) reinforcement. After equal reinforcement rates across components, we introduced a disruptor. Results of Experiments 2 and 3 showed that behaviors were more resistant to extinction and distraction, respectively, with conditioned than with unconditioned reinforcers. Results of Experiment 4, however, showed that when prefeeding disrupted responding, behaviors were more resistant to change with unconditioned reinforcers than with conditioned reinforcers.