The Local History of an Imperial Category: Language and Religion in Russia's Eastern Borderlands, 1860s-1930s

The late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries witnessed the construction and naturalization of many unitary ethnolinguistic categories that would serve diverse ends within the Russian and Soviet states. This article combines disciplinary perspectives from linguistic anthropology and history to e...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Slavic review 2015-04, Vol.74 (1), p.127-152
Main Authors: Graber, Kathryn E., Murray, Jesse D.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
20th century
Anthropological linguistics
Anthropology
Borderlands
Borders
Buddhism
Center and Periphery
Colonialism
Cultural anthropology
Dialects
Ethnolinguistics
Excavation
Language
Language history
Language translation
Languages
Linguistics
Linguists
Missionaries
Motivation
Nationalism
Naturalization
Regional dialects
Religion
Russia
Russian culture
Russian history
Russian language
Syntactic structures
Translation
Twentieth Century
Union of Soviet Socialist Republics
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries witnessed the construction and naturalization of many unitary ethnolinguistic categories that would serve diverse ends within the Russian and Soviet states. This article combines disciplinary perspectives from linguistic anthropology and history to excavate the local history of one such category–the Buriat language. We trace the category's origin in the grammars, translations, and correspondence of its first Russian proponents, Russian Orthodox missionary linguists working in the area around Lake Baikal, and its subsequent uptake by Buriat nationalists and Soviet linguists. We show that the missionaries and their religious motivations played a significant role in the construction of ethnolinguistic categories and that these ethnolinguistic categories were not, as is often thought, predominantly imposed by the center onto distant peripheries. Attending to Orthodox missionaries’ linguistic work in the Baikal region reveals the more complex local workings of colonial power.
ISSN:0037-6779
2325-7784
DOI:10.5612/slavicreview.74.1.127