Diversity, evolutionary specialization and geographic distribution of a mutualistic ant-plant complex: Macaranga and Crematogaster in South East Asia

The most conspicuous and species‐rich ant‐plant mutualism in the Malesian region is found in the important pioneer tree genus Macaranga, yet little is known about the identities or community ecology of the species involved. Our studies have revealed a far more complex system than previously thought....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Biological journal of the Linnean Society 1999-03, Vol.66 (3), p.305-331
Main Authors: FIALA, BRIGITTE, JAKOB, ARMIN, MASCHWITZ, ULRICH, LINSENMAIR, K. EDUARD
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
biogeography
co-evolution
Decacrema
Formicidae
host specificity
Macaranga
Malesia
myrmecophyte
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The most conspicuous and species‐rich ant‐plant mutualism in the Malesian region is found in the important pioneer tree genus Macaranga, yet little is known about the identities or community ecology of the species involved. Our studies have revealed a far more complex system than previously thought. This paper presents the first extensive investigation in the whole distribution area of myrmecophytic Macaranga. All ant‐inhabited species were restricted to the moister parts of SE Asia: Peninsular Malaysia, South and East Thailand, Sumatra and Borneo. We found a rather strict and similar altitudinal zonation of myrmecophytic Macaranga species in all regions. Here we focus on the majority of the 19 Macaranga species obligatorily associated with ants of the genus Crematogaster. We identified a total of 2163 ant queens which belonged to at least eight (morpho)species of the small subgenus Decacrema as well as to one non‐Decacrema (probably from Atopogyne). The ant species were not randomly distributed among the Macaranga species but distinct patterns of associations emerged. Despite common sympatric distribution of Macaranga species, in most cases a surprisingly high specificity of ant colonization was maintained which was, however, often not species‐specific but groups of certain plant species with identical ant partners could be found. These colonization patterns usually but not always mirror existing taxonomic sections within the genus Macaranga. Possible mechanisms of specificity are discussed. The results are compared with other ant‐plant mutualisms.
ISSN:0024-4066
1095-8312
DOI:10.1111/j.1095-8312.1999.tb01893.x