Loading…
Primary Versus Revision Surgery in the Setting of Adult Spinal Deformity: A Nationwide Study on 10,912 Patients
STUDY DESIGN.Retrospective review of a prospectively collected database. OBJECTIVE.This study compares patient demographics, incidence of comorbidities, procedure-related complications, and mortality following primary versus revision adult spinal deformity surgery SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA.Although...
Saved in:
Published in: | Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976) Pa. 1976), 2015-11, Vol.40 (21), p.1674-1680 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | STUDY DESIGN.Retrospective review of a prospectively collected database.
OBJECTIVE.This study compares patient demographics, incidence of comorbidities, procedure-related complications, and mortality following primary versus revision adult spinal deformity surgery
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA.Although adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery has been extensively investigated, no previous study has provided nationwide estimates of patient characteristics and procedure-related complications for primary versus revision spinal deformity surgery comparatively.
METHODS.Nationwide Inpatient Sample data collected between 2001 and 2010 was analyzed. Discharges with procedural codes for anterior and/or posterior thoracic and/or lumbar spinal fusion and refusion were included for patients aged 25+ and 4+ levels fused with any diagnoses specific for scoliosis. Patient demographics, comorbidity, and procedure-related complications incidence were determined for primary versus revision cohorts. Multivariate analysis reported as (OR [95% CI]).
RESULTS.Discharges for 9133 primary and 850 revision cases were identified. Patients differed on the basis of demographic and hospital data. Average comorbidity indices for the cohorts were similar (P = 0.580), as was in-hospital mortality (P = 0.163). The incidence of procedure-related complications was higher for the revision cohort (46.96 % vs. 71.97%, P = 0.001). The mean hospital course for the revision cohort was longer (6.37 vs. 7.13 days, P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0362-2436 1528-1159 |
DOI: | 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001114 |