Loading…

In vitro and in vivo biocompatibility, bioavailability and tolerance of an injectable vehicle for adipose-derived stem/stromal cells for plastic surgery indications

Summary Soft tissue reconstruction is a challenge in plastic surgery, when replacing lost materials and correcting contour defects. Many permanent and temporary fillers have been used to restore the volume of these lesions, but often with poor results and even complications. Adipose-derived stem/str...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery reconstructive & aesthetic surgery, 2015-11, Vol.68 (11), p.1491-1497
Main Authors: Lequeux, Charlotte, Rodriguez, Jonathan, Boucher, Fabien, Rouyer, Ondine, Damour, Odile, Mojallal, Ali, Auxenfans, Céline
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Summary Soft tissue reconstruction is a challenge in plastic surgery, when replacing lost materials and correcting contour defects. Many permanent and temporary fillers have been used to restore the volume of these lesions, but often with poor results and even complications. Adipose-derived stem/stromal cells (ASCs) and adipose tissue engineering have been suggested as valuable alternatives. In order to inject these cultured cells, it was essential to find a suitable vehicle. The purpose of this study was to evaluate Cytocare® , an injectable medical device, composed of hyaluronic acid plus amino acids, vitamins and mineral salts. First, ASC viability and bioavailability in the 3 different available Cytocare® formulations using the MTT test were assessed; then an animal experiment, testing the tolerance after intradermal injections of both Cytocare® alone and with ASCs was carried out. Our in vitro results demonstrate a high biocompatibility of Cytocare® resulting in a better viability of ASCs when cultured in Cytocare® compared to culture medium (p 
ISSN:1748-6815
1878-0539
DOI:10.1016/j.bjps.2015.07.022