Antimicrobial stewardship to optimize the use of antimicrobials for surgical prophylaxis in Egypt: A multicenter pilot intervention study

• Published in: American journal of infection control 2015-11, Vol.43 (11), p.e67-e71
• Main Authors: Saied, Tamer, MD, MSc, Hafez, Soad F., MD, PhD, Kandeel, Amr, MD, PhD, El-kholy, Amany, MD, PhD, Ismail, Ghada, MD, PhD, Aboushady, Mariam, MD, PhD, Attia, Ehab, MD, Hassaan, Ahmed, MD, PhD, Abdel-Atty, Ossama, MD, PhD, Elfekky, Elham, MD, PhD, Girgis, Samia A., MD, PhD, Ismail, Afaf, MD, PhD, Abdou, Enjy, RPh, Okasha, Omar, MPH, Talaat, Maha, MPH, DPH
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anti-Infective Agents - administration & dosage; Antibiotic Prophylaxis - standards; Antibiotic use; Antibiotics; Antimicrobial agents; Child; Child, Preschool; Drug Utilization - standards; Education, Medical; Egypt; Female; Health Policy; Hospitals; Humans; Infant; Infection Control; Infectious Disease; Intervention; Male; Middle Aged; Pilot Projects; Preoperative Care - standards; Preventive medicine; Stewardship; Surgery; Surgical prophylaxis; Surgical Wound Infection - prevention & control; Tertiary Care Centers; Young Adult
• ISSN: 0196-6553; 1527-3296
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2015.07.004

Objective To measure the impact of an antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) program on the use of antibiotics for surgical prophylaxis at acute care hospitals in Egypt. Methods This was a before-and-after intervention study conducted in 5 tertiary, acute-care surgical hospitals. The baseline, intervention, and follow-up periods were 3, 6, and 3 months, respectively. The impact of the intervention was measured by preintervention and postintervention surveys for surgical patients with clean and clean-contaminated wounds. Information was collected on demographic characteristics and antibiotic use. The intervention focused mainly on educating surgical staff on the optimal timing and duration of antibiotics used for surgical prophylaxis. Only 3 hospitals identified a surgeon to audit antibiotic surgical prescriptions. The primary outcome measures were the percentages of surgical patients receiving optimal timing and duration of surgical prophylaxis. Results Data were collected for 745 patients before the intervention and for 558 patients after the intervention. The optimal timing of the first dose improved significantly in 3 hospitals, increasing from 6.7% to 38.7% ( P  < .01), from 2.6% to 15.2% ( P  < .01), and from 0% to 11% ( P  < .01). All hospitals showed a significant rise in the optimal duration of surgical prophylaxis, with an overall increase of 3%-28% ( P  < .01). Days of therapy per 1000 patient-days were decreased significantly in hospitals A, B, C, and D, with no change in hospital E. Conclusions An AMS program focusing on education supported by auditing and feedback can have a significant impact on optimizing antibiotic use in surgical prophylaxis practices.