Vascular access modifies the protective effect of obesity on survival in hemodialysis patients

• Published in: Surgery 2015-12, Vol.158 (6), p.1628-1634
• Main Authors: Arhuidese, Isibor J., MD, MPH, Obeid, Tammam, MD, Hicks, Caitlin, MD, MS, Qazi, Umair, MD, MPH, Botchey, Isaac, MD, MPH, Zarkowsky, Devin S., MD, Reifsnyder, Thomas, MD, Malas, Mahmoud B., MD, MHS
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Arteriovenous Shunt, Surgical; Body Mass Index; Catheters; Female; Humans; Kidney Failure, Chronic - mortality; Kidney Failure, Chronic - physiopathology; Kidney Failure, Chronic - therapy; Male; Matched-Pair Analysis; Middle Aged; Obesity - complications; Obesity - physiopathology; Propensity Score; Regression Analysis; Renal Dialysis - methods; Retrospective Studies; Surgery; Survival Rate; Vascular Access Devices
• ISSN: 0039-6060; 1532-7361
• DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.04.036

Background The protective effect of obesity on the survival of patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD) for end-stage renal disease (ESRD), described as the obesity paradox, has been established previously. Survival benefits also have been ascribed to permanent modes of HD access (fistula/graft) compared with catheter at first HD. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of incident HD access type on the obesity paradox. Methods A retrospective study of all patients with ESRD in the US Renal Database System who initiated HD between 2006 and 2010 was carried out. Multivariate logistic, Cox regression, and propensity score matched analyses were used to evaluate the association between body mass index (BMI), modes of HD access (fistula/graft vs catheter), and mortality. Results There were 501,920 dialysis initiates studied; 83% via catheter, 14% via fistula, and 3% via grafts. Mortality was lesser for patients initiating hemodialysis with permanent forms of access compared with catheter (adjusted odds ratio 0.68, 95% confidence interval 0.67–0.69, P