Touchscreen tasks in mice to demonstrate differences between hippocampal and striatal functions

• Published in: Neurobiology of learning and memory 2015-04, Vol.120, p.16-27
• Main Authors: Delotterie, David F., Mathis, Chantal, Cassel, Jean-Christophe, Rosenbrock, Holger, Dorner-Ciossek, Cornelia, Marti, Anelise
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Animals; Association Learning - physiology; Associative memory; Brain; Corpus Striatum - physiology; Dorsal striatum; Excitotoxic lesions; Hippocampus; Hippocampus - physiology; Learning; Male; Mammals; Maze Learning - physiology; Memory; Memory - physiology; Mice; Mice, Inbred C57BL; Psychomotor Performance - physiology; Rodents; Touchscreen tasks
• ISSN: 1074-7427; 1095-9564
• DOI: 10.1016/j.nlm.2015.02.007

•Learning of dPAL and VMCL touchscreen tasks despite hippocampal (HPC) lesions.•Dorsal striatal (DS) lesions disrupt learning of both tasks in mice.•Both HPC and DS lesions impair spatial working memory in a T-maze apparatus.•Long-term retention performance in the dPAL task requires intact HPC function. In mammals, hippocampal and striatal regions are engaged in separable cognitive processes usually assessed through species-specific paradigms. To reconcile cognitive testing among species, translational advantages of the touchscreen-based automated method have been recently promoted. However, it remains undetermined whether similar neural substrates would be involved in such behavioral tasks both in humans and rodents. To address this question, the effects of hippocampal or dorso-striatal fiber-sparing lesions were first assessed in mice through a battery of tasks (experiment A) comprising the acquisition of two touchscreen paradigms, the Paired Associates Learning (dPAL) and Visuo-Motor Conditional Learning (VMCL) tasks, and a more classical T-maze alternation task. Additionally, we sought to determine whether post-acquisition hippocampal lesions would alter memory retrieval in the dPAL task (experiment B). Pre-training lesions of dorsal striatum caused major impairments in all paradigms. In contrast, pre-training hippocampal lesions disrupted the performance of animals trained in the T-maze assay, but spared the acquisition in touchscreen tasks. Nonetheless, post-training hippocampal lesions severely impacted the recall of the previously learned dPAL task. Altogether, our data show that, after having demonstrated their potential in genetically modified mice, touchscreens also reveal perfectly adapted to taxing functional implications of brain structures in mice by means of lesion approaches. Unlike its human counterpart requiring an intact hippocampus, the acquisition of the dPAL task requires the integrity of the dorsal striatum in mice. The hippocampus only later intervenes, when acquired information needs to be retrieved. Touchscreen assays may therefore be suited to study striatal- or hippocampal-dependent forms of learnings in mice.