Loading…

Biodynamics of copper oxide nanoparticles and copper ions in an oligochaete – Part I: Relative importance of water and sediment as exposure routes

•Both aqueous and nanoparticulate Cu forms are available for uptake by L. variegatus.•Cu accumulation is driven by both water and sediment uptake.•Cu form weakly influences Cu biodynamics in L. variegatus.•Food ingestion rate is a sensitive endpoint for dietborne Cu exposure.•Stable isotope tracers...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Aquatic toxicology 2015-07, Vol.164, p.81-91
Main Authors: Ramskov, Tina, Thit, Amalie, Croteau, Marie-Noële, Selck, Henriette
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•Both aqueous and nanoparticulate Cu forms are available for uptake by L. variegatus.•Cu accumulation is driven by both water and sediment uptake.•Cu form weakly influences Cu biodynamics in L. variegatus.•Food ingestion rate is a sensitive endpoint for dietborne Cu exposure.•Stable isotope tracers allow detecting accumulation after environmentally relevant exposures. Copper oxide (CuO) nanoparticles (NPs) are widely used, and likely released into the aquatic environment. Both aqueous (i.e., dissolved Cu) and particulate Cu can be taken up by organisms. However, how exposure routes influence the bioavailability and subsequent toxicity of Cu remains largely unknown. Here, we assess the importance of exposure routes (water and sediment) and Cu forms (aqueous and nanoparticulate) on Cu bioavailability and toxicity to the freshwater oligochaete, Lumbriculus variegatus, a head-down deposit-feeder. We characterize the bioaccumulation dynamics of Cu in L. variegatus across a range of exposure concentrations, covering both realistic and worst-case levels of Cu contamination in the environment. Both aqueous Cu (Cu-Aq; administered as Cu(NO3)2) and nanoparticulate Cu (CuO NPs), whether dispersed in artificial moderately hard freshwater or mixed into sediment, were weakly accumulated by L. variegatus. Once incorporated into tissues, Cu elimination was negligible, i.e., elimination rate constants were in general not different from zero for either exposure route or either Cu form. Toxicity was only observed after waterborne exposure to Cu-Aq at very high concentration (305μgL−1), where all worms died. There was no relationship between exposure route, Cu form or Cu exposure concentration on either worm survival or growth. Slow feeding rates and low Cu assimilation efficiency (approximately 30%) characterized the uptake of Cu from the sediment for both Cu forms. In nature, L. variegatus is potentially exposed to Cu via both water and sediment. However, sediment progressively becomes the predominant exposure route for Cu in L. variegatus as Cu partitioning to sediment increases.
ISSN:0166-445X
1879-1514
DOI:10.1016/j.aquatox.2015.04.022