Loading…

Addition of growth hormone to the microflare stimulation protocol among women with poor ovarian response

Abstract Objective To assess the efficacy of adding growth hormone (GH) to the microflare stimulation protocol among women with poor ovarian response. Methods A parallel, open-label, randomized controlled trial was conducted among patients with poor ovarian response who attended a center in Cairo, E...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of gynecology and obstetrics 2015-12, Vol.131 (3), p.305-308
Main Authors: Bayoumi, Yomna A., Dakhly, Dina M.R., Bassiouny, Yasmin A., Hashish, Nawara M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Objective To assess the efficacy of adding growth hormone (GH) to the microflare stimulation protocol among women with poor ovarian response. Methods A parallel, open-label, randomized controlled trial was conducted among patients with poor ovarian response who attended a center in Cairo, Egypt, between July 10 and December 31, 2014. Participants were randomly assigned using a computer program (random block size of 4–8) to undergo the microflare protocol with or without GH. Primary outcomes were the mean numbers of mature oocytes retrieved and fertilized. Analyses were done per protocol: women with cycle cancellations were excluded. Results The analysis included 72 women in the GH group and 73 in the microflare only group. The mean number of oocytes collected was 7.2 ± 1.5 in the GH group versus 4.7 ± 1.2 in the microflare only group ( P < 0.001). The mean number of metaphase II oocytes was 5.2 ± 1.2 in the GH group and 2.8 ± 1.0 in the microflare only group ( P < 0.001). The mean number of fertilized oocytes was higher in the GH group (4.2 ± 1.1) than in the microflare only group (2.5 ± 0.7; P < 0.001). Conclusion Addition of GH to the microflare stimulation protocol provided some potential benefits to women with poor ovarian response. However, further studies are required before it could be recommended for routine clinical use. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02185326.
ISSN:0020-7292
1879-3479
DOI:10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.05.034