Loading…
Encephalitogenic and tolerogenic potential of altered peptide ligands of MOG and PLP in Biozzi ABH mice
Altered peptide ligands (APL) are highly effective in inhibiting experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) in rodents although clinical trials in multiple sclerosis reveal severe limitations probably due to the diverse and differential effects of APL in vivo compared to in vitro. Myelin oligod...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of neuroimmunology 2005-10, Vol.167 (1), p.23-33 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Altered peptide ligands (APL) are highly effective in inhibiting experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) in rodents although clinical trials in multiple sclerosis reveal severe limitations probably due to the diverse and differential effects of APL in vivo compared to in vitro. Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG 8–21) induces relapsing EAE in ABH (A
g7) mice associated with broadening of the autoimmune repertoire thus providing a dynamic system to examine the efficacy of peptide analogues. Subtle changes in MOG 8–21 dramatically influenced disease susceptibility and T cell responses in vitro. Non-encephalitogenic APL that induce production of the ‘regulatory’ cytokines IL-10 and/or TGFβ and concomitant low levels of the ‘proinflammatory’ cytokines IFNγ and TNFα modulated relapsing EAE but were far less effective than the ‘proinflammatory’ wild-type MOG 8–21 peptide.
These data reveal that APL differ greatly in their ability to activate encephalitogenic T cells. The extensive heterogeneity of responses of APL in vitro suggests that selection of APL on this criteria is highly unpredictable and probably less effective for therapy than selecting the dominant wild-type epitope and delivering it using a tolerogenic route. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0165-5728 1872-8421 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2005.06.005 |