Understanding the heterogeneity of social preferences for fire prevention management

• Published in: Ecological economics 2014-10, Vol.106, p.91-104
• Main Authors: Varela, Elsa, Jacobsen, Jette Bredahl, Soliño, Mario
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Animal, plant and microbial ecology; Applied ecology; Biological and medical sciences; Choice modelling; Cost; Discrete mixture model; Environmental economics; Environmental protection; Europe; Fire prevention; Fires; Forest fires; Forests; Fuel; Fuel breaks; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Heterogeneity; Latent class model; Machinery; Mediterranean Region; Population; Preferences; Random parameter logit
• ISSN: 0921-8009; 1873-6106
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.07.014

The forest area burnt annually in the European Mediterranean region has more than doubled since the 1970s. In these forests, the main preventive action consists of forest compartmentalization by fuel break networks, which entail high costs and sometimes significant negative impacts. While many studies look at public preferences for fire suppression, this study analyses the heterogeneity of social preferences for fire prevention. The visual characteristics of fire prevention structures are very familiar to respondents, but their management is unfamiliar, which raises specific attention in terms of analysing preference heterogeneity. A random parameter logit model revealed large heterogeneity and preference for traditional heavy machinery, maintaining linear unshaded fuel breaks at a high density. A latent class model showed that this may be reflected by a third of the population preferring lighter machinery and shaded irregular fuel breaks; a quarter of the population not treating the budget constraint as limiting, another quarter only being worried about the area burnt and the remaining group being against everything. Finally, a discrete mixture model revealed extreme preference patterns for the density of fuel breaks. These results are important for designing fire prevention policies that are efficient and acceptable by the population. •A large disparity exists between the population and practitioners in terms of fire perception.•Respondents have clear preferences for how fire prevention should be done.•Respondents prefer alternative cleaning tools like grazing to heavy machinery.•Fuel break density has a trade-off of negative visual impacts and fire risk reduction.•Heterogeneous preferences are related to the understanding of forest fires.