The Decimation and Displacement of Development Economics

ABSTRACT Contemporary mainstream development economics is an overdetermined product of three historical processes: the late neoclassical turn within mainstream economic theory; transformations within the institutional‐discursive matrix of development, from growth‐centred policies to poverty alleviat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Development and change 2015-07, Vol.46 (4), p.733-761
Main Authors: Akbulut, Bengi, Adaman, Fikret, Madra, Yahya M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Antipoverty Programs
Developing Countries
Development economics
Economic Development
Economic Models
Economic theory
Governmentality
Incentives
Institutionalism
Keynesian theory
Keynesianism
Multiculturalism & pluralism
Neoclassical economics
Neoliberalism
Norms
Poverty alleviation
Structural Adjustment
Studies
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:ABSTRACT Contemporary mainstream development economics is an overdetermined product of three historical processes: the late neoclassical turn within mainstream economic theory; transformations within the institutional‐discursive matrix of development, from growth‐centred policies to poverty alleviation‐ and good governance‐oriented policies; and a broader transition from post‐war Keynesian developmentalism (with its variants in the second and third worlds) to existing varieties of neoliberal governmentality. This article assesses the trajectory of development economics through two historical shifts in the theoretical field. The first is from the ‘old’ school of structural transformation with a focus on sectoral balance and shifts to the ‘new’ school of structural adjustment programmes with a focus on micro‐level incentive problems. The second shift is from the aggressively neoclassical orientation of the ‘new’ school to that of the contemporary constellation, where what is considered to be ‘good’ development economics has been gradually reduced to micro‐level impact appraisals of developmental projects (the so‐called ‘randomization approach’), while the broader macro‐economic and historical questions are being increasingly handled through methodologically‐individualist, late neoclassical models of institutions and growth (the so‐called ‘new institutionalism’). The article concludes by insisting on the need for a new paradigm of development economics that would not only unearth the conflictual and antagonistic nature of development, but also render it an indispensable dimension of the study of development in a pluralist manner.
ISSN:0012-155X
1467-7660
DOI:10.1111/dech.12181