Loading…

Environmental management and biological aspects of the two eriophyoid fig mites Aceria ficus (Cotte) and Rhyncaphytoptus ficifoliae Keifer in Egypt

: Mites associated with abandoned fig trees in Egypt were observed during a 2‐year study. This study included species diversity and seasonal fluctuations as well as some biological aspects of common eriophyoid species. Three phytophagous species consisted of the fig bud mite Aceria ficus (Cotte), th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Anzeiger für Schädlingskunde (Berlin, Germany : 1999) Germany : 1999), 2000-02, Vol.73 (1), p.5-12
Main Authors: Abou‐Awad, By B. A., El‐Sawaf, B. M., Reda, A. S., Abdel‐Khalek, A. A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3985-2277425c706bd4c9a3a4796b178e4795eb2af21743a51136b42d572bf07f256f3
cites
container_end_page 12
container_issue 1
container_start_page 5
container_title Anzeiger für Schädlingskunde (Berlin, Germany : 1999)
container_volume 73
creator Abou‐Awad, By B. A.
El‐Sawaf, B. M.
Reda, A. S.
Abdel‐Khalek, A. A.
description : Mites associated with abandoned fig trees in Egypt were observed during a 2‐year study. This study included species diversity and seasonal fluctuations as well as some biological aspects of common eriophyoid species. Three phytophagous species consisted of the fig bud mite Aceria ficus (Cotte), the fig leaf mite Rhyncaphytoptus ficifoliae Keifer and the two‐spotted spider mite Tetranychus urticae Koch, representing a basic trophic level, were fed upon by three of predacious mites (Pronematus ubiquitus (McGregor), Amblyselus swirskii Athias‐Henriot, Agistemus exsertus Gonzalez). Population abundance of the injurious mites were affected by the prevailing climatic conditions, action of predators and leaf age. A control measure of one summer pesticide (abamectin) application throughout the year seemed to be the most successful management of harmful mites. Life table parameters showed that the population of A. ficus multiplied 28.52 times in a generation time of 17.90 days, while R. ficifoliae population increased 16.50 times in a generation time of 14.61 days. Field and laboratory studies indicated that the viviparity is a typical character in the reproduction of R. ficifoliae.
doi_str_mv 10.1046/j.1439-0280.2000.00005.x
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17505193</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2428287909</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3985-2277425c706bd4c9a3a4796b178e4795eb2af21743a51136b42d572bf07f256f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkduKFDEQhhtRcF19h4AietFtjp0OeDMMs-7iguDhOqQzyUyG7qRNMrvbz-ELm55ZFLzyIqSq_q8qof6qAgg2CNL2w6FBlIga4g42GELYlANZ8_CkuvgjPD3Fbc1aQZ5XL1I6LAxqxUX1a-PvXAx-ND6rAYzKq51ZEqD8FvQuDGHndFFUmozOCQQL8t6AfB-AiS5M-zm4LbBuB0aXTQIrXcqqFPQxgXfrkLN5f5r1dT97rQqfw5SLVghnw-CUAZ-NsyYC58FmN0_5ZfXMqiGZV4_3ZfXjavN9fV3ffvl0s17d1pqIjtUYc04x0xy2_ZZqoYiiXLQ94p0pATM9VhYjToliCJG2p3jLOO4t5Baz1pLL6u157hTDz6NJWY4uaTMMyptwTBJxVrYkSAFf_wMewjH68jeJKe5wxwUUherOlI4hpWisnKIbVZwlgnLxSh7kYolcLJGLV_LklXworW8eH1CpLNtG5bVLf_sZEbSjBft4xu7dYOb_Hi9XV99KQH4DOdSniw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2428287909</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Environmental management and biological aspects of the two eriophyoid fig mites Aceria ficus (Cotte) and Rhyncaphytoptus ficifoliae Keifer in Egypt</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Abou‐Awad, By B. A. ; El‐Sawaf, B. M. ; Reda, A. S. ; Abdel‐Khalek, A. A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Abou‐Awad, By B. A. ; El‐Sawaf, B. M. ; Reda, A. S. ; Abdel‐Khalek, A. A.</creatorcontrib><description>: Mites associated with abandoned fig trees in Egypt were observed during a 2‐year study. This study included species diversity and seasonal fluctuations as well as some biological aspects of common eriophyoid species. Three phytophagous species consisted of the fig bud mite Aceria ficus (Cotte), the fig leaf mite Rhyncaphytoptus ficifoliae Keifer and the two‐spotted spider mite Tetranychus urticae Koch, representing a basic trophic level, were fed upon by three of predacious mites (Pronematus ubiquitus (McGregor), Amblyselus swirskii Athias‐Henriot, Agistemus exsertus Gonzalez). Population abundance of the injurious mites were affected by the prevailing climatic conditions, action of predators and leaf age. A control measure of one summer pesticide (abamectin) application throughout the year seemed to be the most successful management of harmful mites. Life table parameters showed that the population of A. ficus multiplied 28.52 times in a generation time of 17.90 days, while R. ficifoliae population increased 16.50 times in a generation time of 14.61 days. Field and laboratory studies indicated that the viviparity is a typical character in the reproduction of R. ficifoliae.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1436-5693</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1612-4758</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1439-0280</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1612-4766</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1046/j.1439-0280.2000.00005.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin: Blackwell Wissenschaftsverlag Ges.m.b.H</publisher><subject>Abamectin ; Aceria ficus ; Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; Chemical control ; Climatic conditions ; Control ; Demecology ; Egypt ; Environmental management ; Ficus ; Fruit trees ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Fungicides ; Insecticides ; Leaves ; Mites ; Pesticides ; Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection ; Predators ; Protozoa. Invertebrata ; Protozoa. Invertebrates ; Rhyncaphytoptus ficifoliae ; Seasonal variations ; Species diversity ; Trophic levels ; Viviparity</subject><ispartof>Anzeiger für Schädlingskunde (Berlin, Germany : 1999), 2000-02, Vol.73 (1), p.5-12</ispartof><rights>2000 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Blackwell Wissenschaftsverlag 2000.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3985-2277425c706bd4c9a3a4796b178e4795eb2af21743a51136b42d572bf07f256f3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1539484$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Abou‐Awad, By B. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El‐Sawaf, B. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reda, A. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdel‐Khalek, A. A.</creatorcontrib><title>Environmental management and biological aspects of the two eriophyoid fig mites Aceria ficus (Cotte) and Rhyncaphytoptus ficifoliae Keifer in Egypt</title><title>Anzeiger für Schädlingskunde (Berlin, Germany : 1999)</title><description>: Mites associated with abandoned fig trees in Egypt were observed during a 2‐year study. This study included species diversity and seasonal fluctuations as well as some biological aspects of common eriophyoid species. Three phytophagous species consisted of the fig bud mite Aceria ficus (Cotte), the fig leaf mite Rhyncaphytoptus ficifoliae Keifer and the two‐spotted spider mite Tetranychus urticae Koch, representing a basic trophic level, were fed upon by three of predacious mites (Pronematus ubiquitus (McGregor), Amblyselus swirskii Athias‐Henriot, Agistemus exsertus Gonzalez). Population abundance of the injurious mites were affected by the prevailing climatic conditions, action of predators and leaf age. A control measure of one summer pesticide (abamectin) application throughout the year seemed to be the most successful management of harmful mites. Life table parameters showed that the population of A. ficus multiplied 28.52 times in a generation time of 17.90 days, while R. ficifoliae population increased 16.50 times in a generation time of 14.61 days. Field and laboratory studies indicated that the viviparity is a typical character in the reproduction of R. ficifoliae.</description><subject>Abamectin</subject><subject>Aceria ficus</subject><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chemical control</subject><subject>Climatic conditions</subject><subject>Control</subject><subject>Demecology</subject><subject>Egypt</subject><subject>Environmental management</subject><subject>Ficus</subject><subject>Fruit trees</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Fungicides</subject><subject>Insecticides</subject><subject>Leaves</subject><subject>Mites</subject><subject>Pesticides</subject><subject>Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>Protozoa. Invertebrata</subject><subject>Protozoa. Invertebrates</subject><subject>Rhyncaphytoptus ficifoliae</subject><subject>Seasonal variations</subject><subject>Species diversity</subject><subject>Trophic levels</subject><subject>Viviparity</subject><issn>1436-5693</issn><issn>1612-4758</issn><issn>1439-0280</issn><issn>1612-4766</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkduKFDEQhhtRcF19h4AietFtjp0OeDMMs-7iguDhOqQzyUyG7qRNMrvbz-ELm55ZFLzyIqSq_q8qof6qAgg2CNL2w6FBlIga4g42GELYlANZ8_CkuvgjPD3Fbc1aQZ5XL1I6LAxqxUX1a-PvXAx-ND6rAYzKq51ZEqD8FvQuDGHndFFUmozOCQQL8t6AfB-AiS5M-zm4LbBuB0aXTQIrXcqqFPQxgXfrkLN5f5r1dT97rQqfw5SLVghnw-CUAZ-NsyYC58FmN0_5ZfXMqiGZV4_3ZfXjavN9fV3ffvl0s17d1pqIjtUYc04x0xy2_ZZqoYiiXLQ94p0pATM9VhYjToliCJG2p3jLOO4t5Baz1pLL6u157hTDz6NJWY4uaTMMyptwTBJxVrYkSAFf_wMewjH68jeJKe5wxwUUherOlI4hpWisnKIbVZwlgnLxSh7kYolcLJGLV_LklXworW8eH1CpLNtG5bVLf_sZEbSjBft4xu7dYOb_Hi9XV99KQH4DOdSniw</recordid><startdate>200002</startdate><enddate>200002</enddate><creator>Abou‐Awad, By B. A.</creator><creator>El‐Sawaf, B. M.</creator><creator>Reda, A. S.</creator><creator>Abdel‐Khalek, A. A.</creator><general>Blackwell Wissenschaftsverlag Ges.m.b.H</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200002</creationdate><title>Environmental management and biological aspects of the two eriophyoid fig mites Aceria ficus (Cotte) and Rhyncaphytoptus ficifoliae Keifer in Egypt</title><author>Abou‐Awad, By B. A. ; El‐Sawaf, B. M. ; Reda, A. S. ; Abdel‐Khalek, A. A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3985-2277425c706bd4c9a3a4796b178e4795eb2af21743a51136b42d572bf07f256f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Abamectin</topic><topic>Aceria ficus</topic><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chemical control</topic><topic>Climatic conditions</topic><topic>Control</topic><topic>Demecology</topic><topic>Egypt</topic><topic>Environmental management</topic><topic>Ficus</topic><topic>Fruit trees</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Fungicides</topic><topic>Insecticides</topic><topic>Leaves</topic><topic>Mites</topic><topic>Pesticides</topic><topic>Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>Protozoa. Invertebrata</topic><topic>Protozoa. Invertebrates</topic><topic>Rhyncaphytoptus ficifoliae</topic><topic>Seasonal variations</topic><topic>Species diversity</topic><topic>Trophic levels</topic><topic>Viviparity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Abou‐Awad, By B. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El‐Sawaf, B. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reda, A. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdel‐Khalek, A. A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>Anzeiger für Schädlingskunde (Berlin, Germany : 1999)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Abou‐Awad, By B. A.</au><au>El‐Sawaf, B. M.</au><au>Reda, A. S.</au><au>Abdel‐Khalek, A. A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Environmental management and biological aspects of the two eriophyoid fig mites Aceria ficus (Cotte) and Rhyncaphytoptus ficifoliae Keifer in Egypt</atitle><jtitle>Anzeiger für Schädlingskunde (Berlin, Germany : 1999)</jtitle><date>2000-02</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>73</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>5</spage><epage>12</epage><pages>5-12</pages><issn>1436-5693</issn><issn>1612-4758</issn><eissn>1439-0280</eissn><eissn>1612-4766</eissn><abstract>: Mites associated with abandoned fig trees in Egypt were observed during a 2‐year study. This study included species diversity and seasonal fluctuations as well as some biological aspects of common eriophyoid species. Three phytophagous species consisted of the fig bud mite Aceria ficus (Cotte), the fig leaf mite Rhyncaphytoptus ficifoliae Keifer and the two‐spotted spider mite Tetranychus urticae Koch, representing a basic trophic level, were fed upon by three of predacious mites (Pronematus ubiquitus (McGregor), Amblyselus swirskii Athias‐Henriot, Agistemus exsertus Gonzalez). Population abundance of the injurious mites were affected by the prevailing climatic conditions, action of predators and leaf age. A control measure of one summer pesticide (abamectin) application throughout the year seemed to be the most successful management of harmful mites. Life table parameters showed that the population of A. ficus multiplied 28.52 times in a generation time of 17.90 days, while R. ficifoliae population increased 16.50 times in a generation time of 14.61 days. Field and laboratory studies indicated that the viviparity is a typical character in the reproduction of R. ficifoliae.</abstract><cop>Berlin</cop><pub>Blackwell Wissenschaftsverlag Ges.m.b.H</pub><doi>10.1046/j.1439-0280.2000.00005.x</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1436-5693
ispartof Anzeiger für Schädlingskunde (Berlin, Germany : 1999), 2000-02, Vol.73 (1), p.5-12
issn 1436-5693
1612-4758
1439-0280
1612-4766
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17505193
source Springer Link
subjects Abamectin
Aceria ficus
Animal and plant ecology
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Animals
Biological and medical sciences
Chemical control
Climatic conditions
Control
Demecology
Egypt
Environmental management
Ficus
Fruit trees
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Fungicides
Insecticides
Leaves
Mites
Pesticides
Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection
Predators
Protozoa. Invertebrata
Protozoa. Invertebrates
Rhyncaphytoptus ficifoliae
Seasonal variations
Species diversity
Trophic levels
Viviparity
title Environmental management and biological aspects of the two eriophyoid fig mites Aceria ficus (Cotte) and Rhyncaphytoptus ficifoliae Keifer in Egypt
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T17%3A21%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Environmental%20management%20and%20biological%20aspects%20of%20the%20two%20eriophyoid%20fig%20mites%20Aceria%20ficus%20(Cotte)%20and%20Rhyncaphytoptus%20ficifoliae%20Keifer%20in%20Egypt&rft.jtitle=Anzeiger%20f%C3%BCr%20Sch%C3%A4dlingskunde%20(Berlin,%20Germany%20:%201999)&rft.au=Abou%E2%80%90Awad,%20By%20B.%20A.&rft.date=2000-02&rft.volume=73&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=5&rft.epage=12&rft.pages=5-12&rft.issn=1436-5693&rft.eissn=1439-0280&rft_id=info:doi/10.1046/j.1439-0280.2000.00005.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2428287909%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3985-2277425c706bd4c9a3a4796b178e4795eb2af21743a51136b42d572bf07f256f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2428287909&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true