Loading…
Environmental management and biological aspects of the two eriophyoid fig mites Aceria ficus (Cotte) and Rhyncaphytoptus ficifoliae Keifer in Egypt
: Mites associated with abandoned fig trees in Egypt were observed during a 2‐year study. This study included species diversity and seasonal fluctuations as well as some biological aspects of common eriophyoid species. Three phytophagous species consisted of the fig bud mite Aceria ficus (Cotte), th...
Saved in:
Published in: | Anzeiger für Schädlingskunde (Berlin, Germany : 1999) Germany : 1999), 2000-02, Vol.73 (1), p.5-12 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3985-2277425c706bd4c9a3a4796b178e4795eb2af21743a51136b42d572bf07f256f3 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 12 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 5 |
container_title | Anzeiger für Schädlingskunde (Berlin, Germany : 1999) |
container_volume | 73 |
creator | Abou‐Awad, By B. A. El‐Sawaf, B. M. Reda, A. S. Abdel‐Khalek, A. A. |
description | : Mites associated with abandoned fig trees in Egypt were observed during a 2‐year study. This study included species diversity and seasonal fluctuations as well as some biological aspects of common eriophyoid species. Three phytophagous species consisted of the fig bud mite Aceria ficus (Cotte), the fig leaf mite Rhyncaphytoptus ficifoliae Keifer and the two‐spotted spider mite Tetranychus urticae Koch, representing a basic trophic level, were fed upon by three of predacious mites (Pronematus ubiquitus (McGregor), Amblyselus swirskii Athias‐Henriot, Agistemus exsertus Gonzalez). Population abundance of the injurious mites were affected by the prevailing climatic conditions, action of predators and leaf age. A control measure of one summer pesticide (abamectin) application throughout the year seemed to be the most successful management of harmful mites. Life table parameters showed that the population of A. ficus multiplied 28.52 times in a generation time of 17.90 days, while R. ficifoliae population increased 16.50 times in a generation time of 14.61 days. Field and laboratory studies indicated that the viviparity is a typical character in the reproduction of R. ficifoliae. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1046/j.1439-0280.2000.00005.x |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17505193</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2428287909</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3985-2277425c706bd4c9a3a4796b178e4795eb2af21743a51136b42d572bf07f256f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkduKFDEQhhtRcF19h4AietFtjp0OeDMMs-7iguDhOqQzyUyG7qRNMrvbz-ELm55ZFLzyIqSq_q8qof6qAgg2CNL2w6FBlIga4g42GELYlANZ8_CkuvgjPD3Fbc1aQZ5XL1I6LAxqxUX1a-PvXAx-ND6rAYzKq51ZEqD8FvQuDGHndFFUmozOCQQL8t6AfB-AiS5M-zm4LbBuB0aXTQIrXcqqFPQxgXfrkLN5f5r1dT97rQqfw5SLVghnw-CUAZ-NsyYC58FmN0_5ZfXMqiGZV4_3ZfXjavN9fV3ffvl0s17d1pqIjtUYc04x0xy2_ZZqoYiiXLQ94p0pATM9VhYjToliCJG2p3jLOO4t5Baz1pLL6u157hTDz6NJWY4uaTMMyptwTBJxVrYkSAFf_wMewjH68jeJKe5wxwUUherOlI4hpWisnKIbVZwlgnLxSh7kYolcLJGLV_LklXworW8eH1CpLNtG5bVLf_sZEbSjBft4xu7dYOb_Hi9XV99KQH4DOdSniw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2428287909</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Environmental management and biological aspects of the two eriophyoid fig mites Aceria ficus (Cotte) and Rhyncaphytoptus ficifoliae Keifer in Egypt</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Abou‐Awad, By B. A. ; El‐Sawaf, B. M. ; Reda, A. S. ; Abdel‐Khalek, A. A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Abou‐Awad, By B. A. ; El‐Sawaf, B. M. ; Reda, A. S. ; Abdel‐Khalek, A. A.</creatorcontrib><description>: Mites associated with abandoned fig trees in Egypt were observed during a 2‐year study. This study included species diversity and seasonal fluctuations as well as some biological aspects of common eriophyoid species. Three phytophagous species consisted of the fig bud mite Aceria ficus (Cotte), the fig leaf mite Rhyncaphytoptus ficifoliae Keifer and the two‐spotted spider mite Tetranychus urticae Koch, representing a basic trophic level, were fed upon by three of predacious mites (Pronematus ubiquitus (McGregor), Amblyselus swirskii Athias‐Henriot, Agistemus exsertus Gonzalez). Population abundance of the injurious mites were affected by the prevailing climatic conditions, action of predators and leaf age. A control measure of one summer pesticide (abamectin) application throughout the year seemed to be the most successful management of harmful mites. Life table parameters showed that the population of A. ficus multiplied 28.52 times in a generation time of 17.90 days, while R. ficifoliae population increased 16.50 times in a generation time of 14.61 days. Field and laboratory studies indicated that the viviparity is a typical character in the reproduction of R. ficifoliae.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1436-5693</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1612-4758</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1439-0280</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1612-4766</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1046/j.1439-0280.2000.00005.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin: Blackwell Wissenschaftsverlag Ges.m.b.H</publisher><subject>Abamectin ; Aceria ficus ; Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; Chemical control ; Climatic conditions ; Control ; Demecology ; Egypt ; Environmental management ; Ficus ; Fruit trees ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Fungicides ; Insecticides ; Leaves ; Mites ; Pesticides ; Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection ; Predators ; Protozoa. Invertebrata ; Protozoa. Invertebrates ; Rhyncaphytoptus ficifoliae ; Seasonal variations ; Species diversity ; Trophic levels ; Viviparity</subject><ispartof>Anzeiger für Schädlingskunde (Berlin, Germany : 1999), 2000-02, Vol.73 (1), p.5-12</ispartof><rights>2000 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Blackwell Wissenschaftsverlag 2000.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3985-2277425c706bd4c9a3a4796b178e4795eb2af21743a51136b42d572bf07f256f3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1539484$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Abou‐Awad, By B. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El‐Sawaf, B. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reda, A. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdel‐Khalek, A. A.</creatorcontrib><title>Environmental management and biological aspects of the two eriophyoid fig mites Aceria ficus (Cotte) and Rhyncaphytoptus ficifoliae Keifer in Egypt</title><title>Anzeiger für Schädlingskunde (Berlin, Germany : 1999)</title><description>: Mites associated with abandoned fig trees in Egypt were observed during a 2‐year study. This study included species diversity and seasonal fluctuations as well as some biological aspects of common eriophyoid species. Three phytophagous species consisted of the fig bud mite Aceria ficus (Cotte), the fig leaf mite Rhyncaphytoptus ficifoliae Keifer and the two‐spotted spider mite Tetranychus urticae Koch, representing a basic trophic level, were fed upon by three of predacious mites (Pronematus ubiquitus (McGregor), Amblyselus swirskii Athias‐Henriot, Agistemus exsertus Gonzalez). Population abundance of the injurious mites were affected by the prevailing climatic conditions, action of predators and leaf age. A control measure of one summer pesticide (abamectin) application throughout the year seemed to be the most successful management of harmful mites. Life table parameters showed that the population of A. ficus multiplied 28.52 times in a generation time of 17.90 days, while R. ficifoliae population increased 16.50 times in a generation time of 14.61 days. Field and laboratory studies indicated that the viviparity is a typical character in the reproduction of R. ficifoliae.</description><subject>Abamectin</subject><subject>Aceria ficus</subject><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chemical control</subject><subject>Climatic conditions</subject><subject>Control</subject><subject>Demecology</subject><subject>Egypt</subject><subject>Environmental management</subject><subject>Ficus</subject><subject>Fruit trees</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Fungicides</subject><subject>Insecticides</subject><subject>Leaves</subject><subject>Mites</subject><subject>Pesticides</subject><subject>Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>Protozoa. Invertebrata</subject><subject>Protozoa. Invertebrates</subject><subject>Rhyncaphytoptus ficifoliae</subject><subject>Seasonal variations</subject><subject>Species diversity</subject><subject>Trophic levels</subject><subject>Viviparity</subject><issn>1436-5693</issn><issn>1612-4758</issn><issn>1439-0280</issn><issn>1612-4766</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkduKFDEQhhtRcF19h4AietFtjp0OeDMMs-7iguDhOqQzyUyG7qRNMrvbz-ELm55ZFLzyIqSq_q8qof6qAgg2CNL2w6FBlIga4g42GELYlANZ8_CkuvgjPD3Fbc1aQZ5XL1I6LAxqxUX1a-PvXAx-ND6rAYzKq51ZEqD8FvQuDGHndFFUmozOCQQL8t6AfB-AiS5M-zm4LbBuB0aXTQIrXcqqFPQxgXfrkLN5f5r1dT97rQqfw5SLVghnw-CUAZ-NsyYC58FmN0_5ZfXMqiGZV4_3ZfXjavN9fV3ffvl0s17d1pqIjtUYc04x0xy2_ZZqoYiiXLQ94p0pATM9VhYjToliCJG2p3jLOO4t5Baz1pLL6u157hTDz6NJWY4uaTMMyptwTBJxVrYkSAFf_wMewjH68jeJKe5wxwUUherOlI4hpWisnKIbVZwlgnLxSh7kYolcLJGLV_LklXworW8eH1CpLNtG5bVLf_sZEbSjBft4xu7dYOb_Hi9XV99KQH4DOdSniw</recordid><startdate>200002</startdate><enddate>200002</enddate><creator>Abou‐Awad, By B. A.</creator><creator>El‐Sawaf, B. M.</creator><creator>Reda, A. S.</creator><creator>Abdel‐Khalek, A. A.</creator><general>Blackwell Wissenschaftsverlag Ges.m.b.H</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200002</creationdate><title>Environmental management and biological aspects of the two eriophyoid fig mites Aceria ficus (Cotte) and Rhyncaphytoptus ficifoliae Keifer in Egypt</title><author>Abou‐Awad, By B. A. ; El‐Sawaf, B. M. ; Reda, A. S. ; Abdel‐Khalek, A. A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3985-2277425c706bd4c9a3a4796b178e4795eb2af21743a51136b42d572bf07f256f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Abamectin</topic><topic>Aceria ficus</topic><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chemical control</topic><topic>Climatic conditions</topic><topic>Control</topic><topic>Demecology</topic><topic>Egypt</topic><topic>Environmental management</topic><topic>Ficus</topic><topic>Fruit trees</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Fungicides</topic><topic>Insecticides</topic><topic>Leaves</topic><topic>Mites</topic><topic>Pesticides</topic><topic>Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>Protozoa. Invertebrata</topic><topic>Protozoa. Invertebrates</topic><topic>Rhyncaphytoptus ficifoliae</topic><topic>Seasonal variations</topic><topic>Species diversity</topic><topic>Trophic levels</topic><topic>Viviparity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Abou‐Awad, By B. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El‐Sawaf, B. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reda, A. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdel‐Khalek, A. A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>Anzeiger für Schädlingskunde (Berlin, Germany : 1999)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Abou‐Awad, By B. A.</au><au>El‐Sawaf, B. M.</au><au>Reda, A. S.</au><au>Abdel‐Khalek, A. A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Environmental management and biological aspects of the two eriophyoid fig mites Aceria ficus (Cotte) and Rhyncaphytoptus ficifoliae Keifer in Egypt</atitle><jtitle>Anzeiger für Schädlingskunde (Berlin, Germany : 1999)</jtitle><date>2000-02</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>73</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>5</spage><epage>12</epage><pages>5-12</pages><issn>1436-5693</issn><issn>1612-4758</issn><eissn>1439-0280</eissn><eissn>1612-4766</eissn><abstract>: Mites associated with abandoned fig trees in Egypt were observed during a 2‐year study. This study included species diversity and seasonal fluctuations as well as some biological aspects of common eriophyoid species. Three phytophagous species consisted of the fig bud mite Aceria ficus (Cotte), the fig leaf mite Rhyncaphytoptus ficifoliae Keifer and the two‐spotted spider mite Tetranychus urticae Koch, representing a basic trophic level, were fed upon by three of predacious mites (Pronematus ubiquitus (McGregor), Amblyselus swirskii Athias‐Henriot, Agistemus exsertus Gonzalez). Population abundance of the injurious mites were affected by the prevailing climatic conditions, action of predators and leaf age. A control measure of one summer pesticide (abamectin) application throughout the year seemed to be the most successful management of harmful mites. Life table parameters showed that the population of A. ficus multiplied 28.52 times in a generation time of 17.90 days, while R. ficifoliae population increased 16.50 times in a generation time of 14.61 days. Field and laboratory studies indicated that the viviparity is a typical character in the reproduction of R. ficifoliae.</abstract><cop>Berlin</cop><pub>Blackwell Wissenschaftsverlag Ges.m.b.H</pub><doi>10.1046/j.1439-0280.2000.00005.x</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1436-5693 |
ispartof | Anzeiger für Schädlingskunde (Berlin, Germany : 1999), 2000-02, Vol.73 (1), p.5-12 |
issn | 1436-5693 1612-4758 1439-0280 1612-4766 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17505193 |
source | Springer Link |
subjects | Abamectin Aceria ficus Animal and plant ecology Animal, plant and microbial ecology Animals Biological and medical sciences Chemical control Climatic conditions Control Demecology Egypt Environmental management Ficus Fruit trees Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Fungicides Insecticides Leaves Mites Pesticides Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection Predators Protozoa. Invertebrata Protozoa. Invertebrates Rhyncaphytoptus ficifoliae Seasonal variations Species diversity Trophic levels Viviparity |
title | Environmental management and biological aspects of the two eriophyoid fig mites Aceria ficus (Cotte) and Rhyncaphytoptus ficifoliae Keifer in Egypt |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T17%3A21%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Environmental%20management%20and%20biological%20aspects%20of%20the%20two%20eriophyoid%20fig%20mites%20Aceria%20ficus%20(Cotte)%20and%20Rhyncaphytoptus%20ficifoliae%20Keifer%20in%20Egypt&rft.jtitle=Anzeiger%20f%C3%BCr%20Sch%C3%A4dlingskunde%20(Berlin,%20Germany%20:%201999)&rft.au=Abou%E2%80%90Awad,%20By%20B.%20A.&rft.date=2000-02&rft.volume=73&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=5&rft.epage=12&rft.pages=5-12&rft.issn=1436-5693&rft.eissn=1439-0280&rft_id=info:doi/10.1046/j.1439-0280.2000.00005.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2428287909%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3985-2277425c706bd4c9a3a4796b178e4795eb2af21743a51136b42d572bf07f256f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2428287909&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |