Loading…

Silica, Silicosis, and Lung Cancer: A Response to a Recent Working Group Report

The relationship between crystalline silica and lung cancer has been the subject of many recent publications, conferences, and regulatory considerations. An influential, international body has determined that there was sufficient evidence to conclude that quartz and cristobalite are carcinogenic in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of occupational and environmental medicine 2000-07, Vol.42 (7), p.704-720
Main Authors: Hessel, Patrick A., Gamble, John F., Gee, J. Bernard L., Gibbs, Graham, Green, Francis H.Y., Morgan, W. Keith C., Mossman, Brooke T.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5315-fa9429ca9db084e62fb99be1345854a075050ff0b40cfc583c3881e52c522dc3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5315-fa9429ca9db084e62fb99be1345854a075050ff0b40cfc583c3881e52c522dc3
container_end_page 720
container_issue 7
container_start_page 704
container_title Journal of occupational and environmental medicine
container_volume 42
creator Hessel, Patrick A.
Gamble, John F.
Gee, J. Bernard L.
Gibbs, Graham
Green, Francis H.Y.
Morgan, W. Keith C.
Mossman, Brooke T.
description The relationship between crystalline silica and lung cancer has been the subject of many recent publications, conferences, and regulatory considerations. An influential, international body has determined that there was sufficient evidence to conclude that quartz and cristobalite are carcinogenic in humans. The present authors believe that the results of these studies are inconsistent and, when positive, only weakly positive. Other, methodologically strong, negative studies have not been considered, and several studies viewed as providing evidence supporting the carcinogenicity of silica have significant methodological weaknesses. Silica is not directly genotoxic and is a pulmonary carcinogen only in the rat, a species that seems to be inappropriate for assessing particulate carcinogenesis in humans. Data on humans demonstrate a lack of association between lung cancer and exposure to crystalline silica. Exposure-response relationships have generally not been found. Studies in which silicotic patients were not identified from compensation registries and in which enumeration was complete did not support a causal association between silicosis and lung cancer, which further argues against the carcinogenicity of crystalline silica.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/00043764-200007000-00005
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17563550</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>44997929</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>44997929</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5315-fa9429ca9db084e62fb99be1345854a075050ff0b40cfc583c3881e52c522dc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kV9LHDEUxYNUqrX9CJZQpE-OvflzJxPfZGmtsCCo4GPIZDN11tnJNJlB_PaNzmpLwYdwT8LvHC4nhFAGJwy0-gYAUqhSFjwrUPkUTwJ3yD5DURaoZfUua1BlwRXyPfIhpTUAQwb4nuzlECaF0Pvk8rrtWmeP6fMMqU3H1PYrupz6X3Rhe-fjKT2jVz4NoU-ejoHafHO-H-ltiPdtxs5jmIb8OIQ4fiS7je2S_7SdB-Tmx_ebxc9ieXl-sThbFg4Fw6KxWnLtrF7VUElf8qbWuvZMSKxQWlAICE0DtQTXOKyEE1XFPHKHnK-cOCBf59ghht-TT6PZtMn5rrO9D1MyTGEpECGDX_4D12GKfV7NcMZLXYGSGapmyMWQUvSNGWK7sfHRMDBPhZuXws1r4ea58Gz9vM2f6o1f_WOcG87A0RawydmuibnTNv3lpJC8ZBmTM_YQutHHdN9NDz6aO2-78c689d_Zdjjb1mkM8TVVSq2V5lr8AZVbngQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>212698074</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Silica, Silicosis, and Lung Cancer: A Response to a Recent Working Group Report</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><creator>Hessel, Patrick A. ; Gamble, John F. ; Gee, J. Bernard L. ; Gibbs, Graham ; Green, Francis H.Y. ; Morgan, W. Keith C. ; Mossman, Brooke T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hessel, Patrick A. ; Gamble, John F. ; Gee, J. Bernard L. ; Gibbs, Graham ; Green, Francis H.Y. ; Morgan, W. Keith C. ; Mossman, Brooke T.</creatorcontrib><description>The relationship between crystalline silica and lung cancer has been the subject of many recent publications, conferences, and regulatory considerations. An influential, international body has determined that there was sufficient evidence to conclude that quartz and cristobalite are carcinogenic in humans. The present authors believe that the results of these studies are inconsistent and, when positive, only weakly positive. Other, methodologically strong, negative studies have not been considered, and several studies viewed as providing evidence supporting the carcinogenicity of silica have significant methodological weaknesses. Silica is not directly genotoxic and is a pulmonary carcinogen only in the rat, a species that seems to be inappropriate for assessing particulate carcinogenesis in humans. Data on humans demonstrate a lack of association between lung cancer and exposure to crystalline silica. Exposure-response relationships have generally not been found. Studies in which silicotic patients were not identified from compensation registries and in which enumeration was complete did not support a causal association between silicosis and lung cancer, which further argues against the carcinogenicity of crystalline silica.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1076-2752</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1536-5948</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00043764-200007000-00005</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10914339</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JOEMFM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</publisher><subject>Animals ; Autopsy ; Biological and medical sciences ; Carcinogens - adverse effects ; Causality ; Chemical and industrial products toxicology. Toxic occupational diseases ; cristobalite ; Humans ; Inorganic dusts (pneumoconiosises) and organic dusts (byssinosis etc.) ; Lung cancer ; Lung Neoplasms - chemically induced ; Lung Neoplasms - epidemiology ; Medical sciences ; Occupational health ; ORIGINAL ARTICLES ; Quartz - adverse effects ; Radiography ; Rats ; Research Design ; silica ; Silicon ; Silicon Dioxide - adverse effects ; Silicosis - epidemiology ; Silicosis - pathology ; Toxicology</subject><ispartof>Journal of occupational and environmental medicine, 2000-07, Vol.42 (7), p.704-720</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2000 American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine</rights><rights>2000 Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc.</rights><rights>2000 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins Jul 2000</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5315-fa9429ca9db084e62fb99be1345854a075050ff0b40cfc583c3881e52c522dc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5315-fa9429ca9db084e62fb99be1345854a075050ff0b40cfc583c3881e52c522dc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/44997929$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/44997929$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27915,27916,58229,58462</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1434261$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10914339$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hessel, Patrick A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gamble, John F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gee, J. Bernard L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gibbs, Graham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, Francis H.Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morgan, W. Keith C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mossman, Brooke T.</creatorcontrib><title>Silica, Silicosis, and Lung Cancer: A Response to a Recent Working Group Report</title><title>Journal of occupational and environmental medicine</title><addtitle>J Occup Environ Med</addtitle><description>The relationship between crystalline silica and lung cancer has been the subject of many recent publications, conferences, and regulatory considerations. An influential, international body has determined that there was sufficient evidence to conclude that quartz and cristobalite are carcinogenic in humans. The present authors believe that the results of these studies are inconsistent and, when positive, only weakly positive. Other, methodologically strong, negative studies have not been considered, and several studies viewed as providing evidence supporting the carcinogenicity of silica have significant methodological weaknesses. Silica is not directly genotoxic and is a pulmonary carcinogen only in the rat, a species that seems to be inappropriate for assessing particulate carcinogenesis in humans. Data on humans demonstrate a lack of association between lung cancer and exposure to crystalline silica. Exposure-response relationships have generally not been found. Studies in which silicotic patients were not identified from compensation registries and in which enumeration was complete did not support a causal association between silicosis and lung cancer, which further argues against the carcinogenicity of crystalline silica.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Autopsy</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Carcinogens - adverse effects</subject><subject>Causality</subject><subject>Chemical and industrial products toxicology. Toxic occupational diseases</subject><subject>cristobalite</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inorganic dusts (pneumoconiosises) and organic dusts (byssinosis etc.)</subject><subject>Lung cancer</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - chemically induced</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - epidemiology</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Occupational health</subject><subject>ORIGINAL ARTICLES</subject><subject>Quartz - adverse effects</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>Rats</subject><subject>Research Design</subject><subject>silica</subject><subject>Silicon</subject><subject>Silicon Dioxide - adverse effects</subject><subject>Silicosis - epidemiology</subject><subject>Silicosis - pathology</subject><subject>Toxicology</subject><issn>1076-2752</issn><issn>1536-5948</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kV9LHDEUxYNUqrX9CJZQpE-OvflzJxPfZGmtsCCo4GPIZDN11tnJNJlB_PaNzmpLwYdwT8LvHC4nhFAGJwy0-gYAUqhSFjwrUPkUTwJ3yD5DURaoZfUua1BlwRXyPfIhpTUAQwb4nuzlECaF0Pvk8rrtWmeP6fMMqU3H1PYrupz6X3Rhe-fjKT2jVz4NoU-ejoHafHO-H-ltiPdtxs5jmIb8OIQ4fiS7je2S_7SdB-Tmx_ebxc9ieXl-sThbFg4Fw6KxWnLtrF7VUElf8qbWuvZMSKxQWlAICE0DtQTXOKyEE1XFPHKHnK-cOCBf59ghht-TT6PZtMn5rrO9D1MyTGEpECGDX_4D12GKfV7NcMZLXYGSGapmyMWQUvSNGWK7sfHRMDBPhZuXws1r4ea58Gz9vM2f6o1f_WOcG87A0RawydmuibnTNv3lpJC8ZBmTM_YQutHHdN9NDz6aO2-78c689d_Zdjjb1mkM8TVVSq2V5lr8AZVbngQ</recordid><startdate>200007</startdate><enddate>200007</enddate><creator>Hessel, Patrick A.</creator><creator>Gamble, John F.</creator><creator>Gee, J. Bernard L.</creator><creator>Gibbs, Graham</creator><creator>Green, Francis H.Y.</creator><creator>Morgan, W. Keith C.</creator><creator>Mossman, Brooke T.</creator><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc</general><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins Ovid Technologies</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7U2</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200007</creationdate><title>Silica, Silicosis, and Lung Cancer: A Response to a Recent Working Group Report</title><author>Hessel, Patrick A. ; Gamble, John F. ; Gee, J. Bernard L. ; Gibbs, Graham ; Green, Francis H.Y. ; Morgan, W. Keith C. ; Mossman, Brooke T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5315-fa9429ca9db084e62fb99be1345854a075050ff0b40cfc583c3881e52c522dc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Autopsy</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Carcinogens - adverse effects</topic><topic>Causality</topic><topic>Chemical and industrial products toxicology. Toxic occupational diseases</topic><topic>cristobalite</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inorganic dusts (pneumoconiosises) and organic dusts (byssinosis etc.)</topic><topic>Lung cancer</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - chemically induced</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - epidemiology</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Occupational health</topic><topic>ORIGINAL ARTICLES</topic><topic>Quartz - adverse effects</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>Rats</topic><topic>Research Design</topic><topic>silica</topic><topic>Silicon</topic><topic>Silicon Dioxide - adverse effects</topic><topic>Silicosis - epidemiology</topic><topic>Silicosis - pathology</topic><topic>Toxicology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hessel, Patrick A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gamble, John F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gee, J. Bernard L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gibbs, Graham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, Francis H.Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morgan, W. Keith C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mossman, Brooke T.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><jtitle>Journal of occupational and environmental medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hessel, Patrick A.</au><au>Gamble, John F.</au><au>Gee, J. Bernard L.</au><au>Gibbs, Graham</au><au>Green, Francis H.Y.</au><au>Morgan, W. Keith C.</au><au>Mossman, Brooke T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Silica, Silicosis, and Lung Cancer: A Response to a Recent Working Group Report</atitle><jtitle>Journal of occupational and environmental medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J Occup Environ Med</addtitle><date>2000-07</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>704</spage><epage>720</epage><pages>704-720</pages><issn>1076-2752</issn><eissn>1536-5948</eissn><coden>JOEMFM</coden><abstract>The relationship between crystalline silica and lung cancer has been the subject of many recent publications, conferences, and regulatory considerations. An influential, international body has determined that there was sufficient evidence to conclude that quartz and cristobalite are carcinogenic in humans. The present authors believe that the results of these studies are inconsistent and, when positive, only weakly positive. Other, methodologically strong, negative studies have not been considered, and several studies viewed as providing evidence supporting the carcinogenicity of silica have significant methodological weaknesses. Silica is not directly genotoxic and is a pulmonary carcinogen only in the rat, a species that seems to be inappropriate for assessing particulate carcinogenesis in humans. Data on humans demonstrate a lack of association between lung cancer and exposure to crystalline silica. Exposure-response relationships have generally not been found. Studies in which silicotic patients were not identified from compensation registries and in which enumeration was complete did not support a causal association between silicosis and lung cancer, which further argues against the carcinogenicity of crystalline silica.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</pub><pmid>10914339</pmid><doi>10.1097/00043764-200007000-00005</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1076-2752
ispartof Journal of occupational and environmental medicine, 2000-07, Vol.42 (7), p.704-720
issn 1076-2752
1536-5948
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17563550
source JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection
subjects Animals
Autopsy
Biological and medical sciences
Carcinogens - adverse effects
Causality
Chemical and industrial products toxicology. Toxic occupational diseases
cristobalite
Humans
Inorganic dusts (pneumoconiosises) and organic dusts (byssinosis etc.)
Lung cancer
Lung Neoplasms - chemically induced
Lung Neoplasms - epidemiology
Medical sciences
Occupational health
ORIGINAL ARTICLES
Quartz - adverse effects
Radiography
Rats
Research Design
silica
Silicon
Silicon Dioxide - adverse effects
Silicosis - epidemiology
Silicosis - pathology
Toxicology
title Silica, Silicosis, and Lung Cancer: A Response to a Recent Working Group Report
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T06%3A44%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Silica,%20Silicosis,%20and%20Lung%20Cancer:%20A%20Response%20to%20a%20Recent%20Working%20Group%20Report&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20occupational%20and%20environmental%20medicine&rft.au=Hessel,%20Patrick%20A.&rft.date=2000-07&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=704&rft.epage=720&rft.pages=704-720&rft.issn=1076-2752&rft.eissn=1536-5948&rft.coden=JOEMFM&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00043764-200007000-00005&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E44997929%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5315-fa9429ca9db084e62fb99be1345854a075050ff0b40cfc583c3881e52c522dc3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=212698074&rft_id=info:pmid/10914339&rft_jstor_id=44997929&rfr_iscdi=true