Loading…
Silica, Silicosis, and Lung Cancer: A Response to a Recent Working Group Report
The relationship between crystalline silica and lung cancer has been the subject of many recent publications, conferences, and regulatory considerations. An influential, international body has determined that there was sufficient evidence to conclude that quartz and cristobalite are carcinogenic in...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of occupational and environmental medicine 2000-07, Vol.42 (7), p.704-720 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5315-fa9429ca9db084e62fb99be1345854a075050ff0b40cfc583c3881e52c522dc3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5315-fa9429ca9db084e62fb99be1345854a075050ff0b40cfc583c3881e52c522dc3 |
container_end_page | 720 |
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 704 |
container_title | Journal of occupational and environmental medicine |
container_volume | 42 |
creator | Hessel, Patrick A. Gamble, John F. Gee, J. Bernard L. Gibbs, Graham Green, Francis H.Y. Morgan, W. Keith C. Mossman, Brooke T. |
description | The relationship between crystalline silica and lung cancer has been the subject of many recent publications, conferences, and regulatory considerations. An influential, international body has determined that there was sufficient evidence to conclude that quartz and cristobalite are carcinogenic in humans. The present authors believe that the results of these studies are inconsistent and, when positive, only weakly positive. Other, methodologically strong, negative studies have not been considered, and several studies viewed as providing evidence supporting the carcinogenicity of silica have significant methodological weaknesses. Silica is not directly genotoxic and is a pulmonary carcinogen only in the rat, a species that seems to be inappropriate for assessing particulate carcinogenesis in humans. Data on humans demonstrate a lack of association between lung cancer and exposure to crystalline silica. Exposure-response relationships have generally not been found. Studies in which silicotic patients were not identified from compensation registries and in which enumeration was complete did not support a causal association between silicosis and lung cancer, which further argues against the carcinogenicity of crystalline silica. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1097/00043764-200007000-00005 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17563550</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>44997929</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>44997929</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5315-fa9429ca9db084e62fb99be1345854a075050ff0b40cfc583c3881e52c522dc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kV9LHDEUxYNUqrX9CJZQpE-OvflzJxPfZGmtsCCo4GPIZDN11tnJNJlB_PaNzmpLwYdwT8LvHC4nhFAGJwy0-gYAUqhSFjwrUPkUTwJ3yD5DURaoZfUua1BlwRXyPfIhpTUAQwb4nuzlECaF0Pvk8rrtWmeP6fMMqU3H1PYrupz6X3Rhe-fjKT2jVz4NoU-ejoHafHO-H-ltiPdtxs5jmIb8OIQ4fiS7je2S_7SdB-Tmx_ebxc9ieXl-sThbFg4Fw6KxWnLtrF7VUElf8qbWuvZMSKxQWlAICE0DtQTXOKyEE1XFPHKHnK-cOCBf59ghht-TT6PZtMn5rrO9D1MyTGEpECGDX_4D12GKfV7NcMZLXYGSGapmyMWQUvSNGWK7sfHRMDBPhZuXws1r4ea58Gz9vM2f6o1f_WOcG87A0RawydmuibnTNv3lpJC8ZBmTM_YQutHHdN9NDz6aO2-78c689d_Zdjjb1mkM8TVVSq2V5lr8AZVbngQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>212698074</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Silica, Silicosis, and Lung Cancer: A Response to a Recent Working Group Report</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><creator>Hessel, Patrick A. ; Gamble, John F. ; Gee, J. Bernard L. ; Gibbs, Graham ; Green, Francis H.Y. ; Morgan, W. Keith C. ; Mossman, Brooke T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hessel, Patrick A. ; Gamble, John F. ; Gee, J. Bernard L. ; Gibbs, Graham ; Green, Francis H.Y. ; Morgan, W. Keith C. ; Mossman, Brooke T.</creatorcontrib><description>The relationship between crystalline silica and lung cancer has been the subject of many recent publications, conferences, and regulatory considerations. An influential, international body has determined that there was sufficient evidence to conclude that quartz and cristobalite are carcinogenic in humans. The present authors believe that the results of these studies are inconsistent and, when positive, only weakly positive. Other, methodologically strong, negative studies have not been considered, and several studies viewed as providing evidence supporting the carcinogenicity of silica have significant methodological weaknesses. Silica is not directly genotoxic and is a pulmonary carcinogen only in the rat, a species that seems to be inappropriate for assessing particulate carcinogenesis in humans. Data on humans demonstrate a lack of association between lung cancer and exposure to crystalline silica. Exposure-response relationships have generally not been found. Studies in which silicotic patients were not identified from compensation registries and in which enumeration was complete did not support a causal association between silicosis and lung cancer, which further argues against the carcinogenicity of crystalline silica.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1076-2752</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1536-5948</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00043764-200007000-00005</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10914339</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JOEMFM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</publisher><subject>Animals ; Autopsy ; Biological and medical sciences ; Carcinogens - adverse effects ; Causality ; Chemical and industrial products toxicology. Toxic occupational diseases ; cristobalite ; Humans ; Inorganic dusts (pneumoconiosises) and organic dusts (byssinosis etc.) ; Lung cancer ; Lung Neoplasms - chemically induced ; Lung Neoplasms - epidemiology ; Medical sciences ; Occupational health ; ORIGINAL ARTICLES ; Quartz - adverse effects ; Radiography ; Rats ; Research Design ; silica ; Silicon ; Silicon Dioxide - adverse effects ; Silicosis - epidemiology ; Silicosis - pathology ; Toxicology</subject><ispartof>Journal of occupational and environmental medicine, 2000-07, Vol.42 (7), p.704-720</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2000 American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine</rights><rights>2000 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.</rights><rights>2000 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Jul 2000</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5315-fa9429ca9db084e62fb99be1345854a075050ff0b40cfc583c3881e52c522dc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5315-fa9429ca9db084e62fb99be1345854a075050ff0b40cfc583c3881e52c522dc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/44997929$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/44997929$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27915,27916,58229,58462</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1434261$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10914339$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hessel, Patrick A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gamble, John F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gee, J. Bernard L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gibbs, Graham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, Francis H.Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morgan, W. Keith C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mossman, Brooke T.</creatorcontrib><title>Silica, Silicosis, and Lung Cancer: A Response to a Recent Working Group Report</title><title>Journal of occupational and environmental medicine</title><addtitle>J Occup Environ Med</addtitle><description>The relationship between crystalline silica and lung cancer has been the subject of many recent publications, conferences, and regulatory considerations. An influential, international body has determined that there was sufficient evidence to conclude that quartz and cristobalite are carcinogenic in humans. The present authors believe that the results of these studies are inconsistent and, when positive, only weakly positive. Other, methodologically strong, negative studies have not been considered, and several studies viewed as providing evidence supporting the carcinogenicity of silica have significant methodological weaknesses. Silica is not directly genotoxic and is a pulmonary carcinogen only in the rat, a species that seems to be inappropriate for assessing particulate carcinogenesis in humans. Data on humans demonstrate a lack of association between lung cancer and exposure to crystalline silica. Exposure-response relationships have generally not been found. Studies in which silicotic patients were not identified from compensation registries and in which enumeration was complete did not support a causal association between silicosis and lung cancer, which further argues against the carcinogenicity of crystalline silica.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Autopsy</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Carcinogens - adverse effects</subject><subject>Causality</subject><subject>Chemical and industrial products toxicology. Toxic occupational diseases</subject><subject>cristobalite</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inorganic dusts (pneumoconiosises) and organic dusts (byssinosis etc.)</subject><subject>Lung cancer</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - chemically induced</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - epidemiology</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Occupational health</subject><subject>ORIGINAL ARTICLES</subject><subject>Quartz - adverse effects</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>Rats</subject><subject>Research Design</subject><subject>silica</subject><subject>Silicon</subject><subject>Silicon Dioxide - adverse effects</subject><subject>Silicosis - epidemiology</subject><subject>Silicosis - pathology</subject><subject>Toxicology</subject><issn>1076-2752</issn><issn>1536-5948</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kV9LHDEUxYNUqrX9CJZQpE-OvflzJxPfZGmtsCCo4GPIZDN11tnJNJlB_PaNzmpLwYdwT8LvHC4nhFAGJwy0-gYAUqhSFjwrUPkUTwJ3yD5DURaoZfUua1BlwRXyPfIhpTUAQwb4nuzlECaF0Pvk8rrtWmeP6fMMqU3H1PYrupz6X3Rhe-fjKT2jVz4NoU-ejoHafHO-H-ltiPdtxs5jmIb8OIQ4fiS7je2S_7SdB-Tmx_ebxc9ieXl-sThbFg4Fw6KxWnLtrF7VUElf8qbWuvZMSKxQWlAICE0DtQTXOKyEE1XFPHKHnK-cOCBf59ghht-TT6PZtMn5rrO9D1MyTGEpECGDX_4D12GKfV7NcMZLXYGSGapmyMWQUvSNGWK7sfHRMDBPhZuXws1r4ea58Gz9vM2f6o1f_WOcG87A0RawydmuibnTNv3lpJC8ZBmTM_YQutHHdN9NDz6aO2-78c689d_Zdjjb1mkM8TVVSq2V5lr8AZVbngQ</recordid><startdate>200007</startdate><enddate>200007</enddate><creator>Hessel, Patrick A.</creator><creator>Gamble, John F.</creator><creator>Gee, J. Bernard L.</creator><creator>Gibbs, Graham</creator><creator>Green, Francis H.Y.</creator><creator>Morgan, W. Keith C.</creator><creator>Mossman, Brooke T.</creator><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</general><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc</general><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Ovid Technologies</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7U2</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200007</creationdate><title>Silica, Silicosis, and Lung Cancer: A Response to a Recent Working Group Report</title><author>Hessel, Patrick A. ; Gamble, John F. ; Gee, J. Bernard L. ; Gibbs, Graham ; Green, Francis H.Y. ; Morgan, W. Keith C. ; Mossman, Brooke T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5315-fa9429ca9db084e62fb99be1345854a075050ff0b40cfc583c3881e52c522dc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Autopsy</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Carcinogens - adverse effects</topic><topic>Causality</topic><topic>Chemical and industrial products toxicology. Toxic occupational diseases</topic><topic>cristobalite</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inorganic dusts (pneumoconiosises) and organic dusts (byssinosis etc.)</topic><topic>Lung cancer</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - chemically induced</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - epidemiology</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Occupational health</topic><topic>ORIGINAL ARTICLES</topic><topic>Quartz - adverse effects</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>Rats</topic><topic>Research Design</topic><topic>silica</topic><topic>Silicon</topic><topic>Silicon Dioxide - adverse effects</topic><topic>Silicosis - epidemiology</topic><topic>Silicosis - pathology</topic><topic>Toxicology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hessel, Patrick A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gamble, John F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gee, J. Bernard L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gibbs, Graham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, Francis H.Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morgan, W. Keith C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mossman, Brooke T.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><jtitle>Journal of occupational and environmental medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hessel, Patrick A.</au><au>Gamble, John F.</au><au>Gee, J. Bernard L.</au><au>Gibbs, Graham</au><au>Green, Francis H.Y.</au><au>Morgan, W. Keith C.</au><au>Mossman, Brooke T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Silica, Silicosis, and Lung Cancer: A Response to a Recent Working Group Report</atitle><jtitle>Journal of occupational and environmental medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J Occup Environ Med</addtitle><date>2000-07</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>704</spage><epage>720</epage><pages>704-720</pages><issn>1076-2752</issn><eissn>1536-5948</eissn><coden>JOEMFM</coden><abstract>The relationship between crystalline silica and lung cancer has been the subject of many recent publications, conferences, and regulatory considerations. An influential, international body has determined that there was sufficient evidence to conclude that quartz and cristobalite are carcinogenic in humans. The present authors believe that the results of these studies are inconsistent and, when positive, only weakly positive. Other, methodologically strong, negative studies have not been considered, and several studies viewed as providing evidence supporting the carcinogenicity of silica have significant methodological weaknesses. Silica is not directly genotoxic and is a pulmonary carcinogen only in the rat, a species that seems to be inappropriate for assessing particulate carcinogenesis in humans. Data on humans demonstrate a lack of association between lung cancer and exposure to crystalline silica. Exposure-response relationships have generally not been found. Studies in which silicotic patients were not identified from compensation registries and in which enumeration was complete did not support a causal association between silicosis and lung cancer, which further argues against the carcinogenicity of crystalline silica.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</pub><pmid>10914339</pmid><doi>10.1097/00043764-200007000-00005</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1076-2752 |
ispartof | Journal of occupational and environmental medicine, 2000-07, Vol.42 (7), p.704-720 |
issn | 1076-2752 1536-5948 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17563550 |
source | JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection |
subjects | Animals Autopsy Biological and medical sciences Carcinogens - adverse effects Causality Chemical and industrial products toxicology. Toxic occupational diseases cristobalite Humans Inorganic dusts (pneumoconiosises) and organic dusts (byssinosis etc.) Lung cancer Lung Neoplasms - chemically induced Lung Neoplasms - epidemiology Medical sciences Occupational health ORIGINAL ARTICLES Quartz - adverse effects Radiography Rats Research Design silica Silicon Silicon Dioxide - adverse effects Silicosis - epidemiology Silicosis - pathology Toxicology |
title | Silica, Silicosis, and Lung Cancer: A Response to a Recent Working Group Report |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T06%3A44%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Silica,%20Silicosis,%20and%20Lung%20Cancer:%20A%20Response%20to%20a%20Recent%20Working%20Group%20Report&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20occupational%20and%20environmental%20medicine&rft.au=Hessel,%20Patrick%20A.&rft.date=2000-07&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=704&rft.epage=720&rft.pages=704-720&rft.issn=1076-2752&rft.eissn=1536-5948&rft.coden=JOEMFM&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00043764-200007000-00005&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E44997929%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5315-fa9429ca9db084e62fb99be1345854a075050ff0b40cfc583c3881e52c522dc3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=212698074&rft_id=info:pmid/10914339&rft_jstor_id=44997929&rfr_iscdi=true |